|
|
||||||||
Computers in Radiology |
1
Department of Radiology, VA Maryland Health Care System, 10 N. Greene St.,
Baltimore, MD 21201.
2
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S.
Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.
3
Department of Radiology, Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, 801 Middleford Rd.,
Seaford, DE 19973.
OBJECTIVE. Our objective is to emphasize the importance of work flow redesign, rather than filmless operation itself, to achieve cost reduction and improvement in productivity with picture archiving and communication systems (PACS).
CONCLUSION. Our 8-year experience with PACS shows that the greatest benefit of the transition to a digital system has been the ability to use it as a tool to reengineer overall work flow, both in the imaging department and throughout the health care enterprise.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. F. Branstetter IV Basics of Imaging Informatics: Part 2 Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 78 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Reiner, E. L. Siegel, K. M. Siddiqui, and A. E. Musk Quality Assurance: The Missing Link Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 13 - 15. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Reiner and E. L. Siegel Technologists' Productivity When Using PACS: Comparison of Film-Based Versus Filmless Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2002; 179(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |