|
|
||||||||
1
Department of Radiology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels, 808 Route de
Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
2
Department of Vascular Pathology, Erasme Hospital, University of Brussels,
1070 Brussels, Belgium.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare color Doppler sonography with biphasic helical CT in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-five patients prospectively underwent both color Doppler sonography and helical CT within 7 days after treatment by endovascular stent-graft. Aneurysmal thrombosis, the patency of the grafts, and the presence of a leak were evaluated in all patients. When a perigraft leak was observed, an attempt was made to identify its origin and outflow vessels. Helical CT was considered the gold standard technique.
RESULTS. Helical CT revealed aneurysmal thrombosis in 33 patients and a perigraft leak in 22 patients. In five patients, helical CT detected a small perigraft leak not shown by color Doppler sonography. In three patients with suboptimal examinations, color Doppler sonography revealed a suspected perigraft leak that was not confirmed by helical CT. In these eight patients, the perigraft leak was sealed or no longer observed during follow-up. Compared with enhanced helical CT, the sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of a perigraft leak were 77% and 90%, respectively. In seven other patients, helical CT was superior to color Doppler sonography in detecting the origin of the perigraft leak and the outflow vessels. Two iliac artery dissections and one distal migration of the prosthesis were revealed only by helical CT.
CONCLUSION. Although color Doppler sonography may detect substantial perigraft leaks, helical CT is superior for detecting the origin of the perigraft leak, the outflow vessels, and the detection of complications related to the procedure.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Giannoni, F. Fanelli, M. Citone, M. Cristina Acconcia, F. Speziale, and B. Gossetti Contrast ultrasound imaging: the best method to detect type II endoleak during endovascular aneurysm repair follow-up Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 359 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Stavropoulos and S. R. Charagundla Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 641 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macari, H. Chandarana, B. Schmidt, J. Lee, P. Lamparello, and J. Babb Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Can the Arterial Phase at CT Evaluation after Endovascular Repair Be Eliminated to Reduce Radiation Dose? Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 908 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Maldonado and P. J. Gagne Controversies in the Management of Type 11 "Branch" Endoleaks Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2003; 37(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |