HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tomura, N. Articles by Yokomizo, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tomura, N. Articles by Yokomizo, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Irradiated Carcinoma of the Tongue

Correlation of MR Imaging Findings with Pathology

¹ Department of Radiology, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1, Hondo, Akita City, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
² Department of Pathology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita City, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
³ Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita City, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. MR imaging was prospectively correlated with pathologic findings to study whether MR imaging can differentiate viable from nonviable tumor tissue in the irradiated carcinoma of the tongue.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. MR examinations were performed after radiation therapy in 21 patients with carcinoma of the tongue. All patients underwent either a total glossectomy or hemiglossectomy after radiation therapy. Specimens were examined microscopically. Radiation changes were histologically graded into four groups (I, minimal cellular changes; II, presence of cellular changes and partial destruction of the tumor; III, only nonviable tumor cells; IV, no tumor cells). MR examinations included T2-weighted imaging, unenhanced T1-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging.

RESULTS. On unenhanced T1-weighted images, the lesion was hypointense, except for two patients with histologic grade III. On T2-weighted images, the lesion appeared hyperintense in 12 of 14 patients with viable tumor cells (grades I and II); however, the lesion was hypointense in four, and isointense in two of seven patients with nonviable tumor cells (grades III or IV). Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed that the degree of contrast enhancement of the lesion was equal to or lower than that of a normal salivary gland in 18 of 21 patients. For the time of maximal enhancement of the lesion on dynamic imaging, there was no substantial difference between viable (grades I and II) and nonviable (grades III and IV) tumor tissue.

CONCLUSION. The present study shows that T2-weighted imaging is feasible for differentiating viable from nonviable tumor tissue in irradiated carcinoma of the tongue.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Lam, K. M. Au-Yeung, P. W. Cheng, W. I. Wei, A. P.-W. Yuen, N. Trendell-Smith, J. H. C. Li, and R. Li Correlating MRI and Histologic Tumor Thickness in the Assessment of Oral Tongue Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]