|
|
||||||||
1
Discipline of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus, Callaghan,
New South Wales, 2308 Australia.
2
Department of Medical Imaging, John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1, Newcastle
Region Mail Center, 2310 Australia.
OBJECTIVE. Obstructive uropathy in the early stages can be difficult to diagnose using either standard sonography or the arterial resistive index. We tested the hypothesis that acute obstruction of the renal collecting system reduces the intraparenchymal renal compliance, which affects the intraparenchymal venous blood flow to a greater degree than the arterial flow.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twelve patients with clinical evidence of acute obstructive uropathy were referred for helical CT to confirm the diagnosis and to provide a gold standard by which we could evaluate the sonographic findings in the 12 test patients. Twelve patients without renal disease served as a control group. Doppler sonography of the interlobar arteries and veins of both kidneys then was performed, with the sonographer unaware of which kidney had an obstruction. Peak venous flow measurements and arterial resistive and venous impedance indexes were obtained. The impedance indexes of the obstructed and unobstructed kidney were compared for each patient.
RESULTS. The mean arterial resistive indexes of the obstructed kidneys were larger than those of the unobstructed kidneys, 0.67 ± 0.08 and 0.62 ± 0.05, respectively (p = 0.05). The venous impedance indexes comparing obstructed and unobstructed sides were 0.38 ± 0.25 and 0.80 ± 0.25, respectively, a statistically significant result (p = 0.0002). On average, the peak venous flow signal in the obstructed kidney was 69% higher than that of the unobstructed kidney (p = 0.04) and 86% higher than that of the peak venous flow signal in the control group (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSION. Renal obstruction alters the venous flow to a greater extent than the arterial flow, and a comparison between the venous flow in the obstructed and unobstructed kidneys may improve diagnostic accuracy.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B YAGCI, B TAVASLI, N KARABULUT, and Y KIROGLU Clinical significance and renal haemodynamics of incidentally detected retroaortic left renal vein: assessment with venous Doppler sonography Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2008; 81(963): 187 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S J Freeman and H Sells Investigation of loin pain Imaging, August 1, 2005; 17(1): 19 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Bateman, W. Giles, and S. L. England Renal Venous Doppler Sonography in Preeclampsia J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1607 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tranquart and S. O. Oktar Doppler Sonography of Renal Obstruction * Reply J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1684 - 1685. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O. Oktar, C. Yucel, H. Ozdemir, and D. Karaosmanoglu Doppler Sonography of Renal Obstruction: Value of Venous Impedance Index Measurements J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 929 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Karabulut, A Baki Yagci, and A Karabulut Renal vein Doppler ultrasound of maternal kidneys in normal second and third trimester pregnancy Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 444 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |