AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mansilla, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boiselle, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mansilla, A. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:945-948
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

A Closer Look at the Midsternal Stripe Sign

Phillip M. Boiselle1 and Alberto V. Mansilla2,3

1 Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215.
2 Department of Radiology, Temple University Hospital, 3401 N. Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Florida Hospital, 601 E. Rawlings St., Orlando, FL 32806.

OBJECTIVE. Reports in the literature offer conflicting data on the value of the midsternal stripe sign in diagnosing sternal dehiscence. Our purpose was to determine the frequency with which the midsternal stripe sign is present in patients with dehiscence compared with a control group without this complication and to determine whether this sign adds incremental value to the sign of sternal wire displacement in the diagnosis of dehiscence.

CONCLUSION. A midsternal stripe thicker than 3 mm should raise one's suspicion of the presence of sternal dehiscence. However, this sign is rarely observed in patients with this complication and does not add incremental value to the finding of sternal wire displacement in establishing the diagnosis of dehiscence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.