AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qayyum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Herfkens, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qayyum, A.
Right arrow Articles by Herfkens, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 178:1227-1232
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MR Imaging Features of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

Histopathologic Correlation

Aliya Qayyum1, Robyn L. Birdwell2, Bruce L. Daniel2, Kent W. Nowels2, Stefanie S. Jeffrey2, Tony A. Agoston2 and Robert J. Herfkens2

1 Department of Radiology, Box 0628, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0628.
2 Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr., Stanford, CA 94305.

OBJECTIVE. Our study aimed to correlate the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR appearance of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast with histopathologic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the high-resolution, fat-suppressed and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of 13 of 20 women diagnosed with pathologically proven infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. Twelve of the 13 women presented with breast symptoms and underwent mammography. Five of the women also had breast sonography. MR imaging was performed for evaluation of disease extent before the patients underwent modified radical mastectomy (n = 11) or lumpectomy (n = 2). Three experienced radiologists reviewed the MR scans. The tumor pattern types described on imaging were correlated with a detailed analysis of the pathology.

RESULTS. We found three patterns of infiltrating lobular carcinoma on MR imaging. The tumor pattern on imaging correlated with pathologic tumor morphology. We found the following patterns of infiltrating lobular carcinoma: a solitary mass with irregular margins (n = 4) that corresponded to the same appearance at pathology; multiple lesions, either connected by enhancing strands (n = 6) or separated by nonenhancing intervening tissue (n = 2), that correlated with the pathologic appearance of noncontiguous tumor foci, with malignant cells streaming in single-file fashion in the breast stroma or small tumor aggregates separated by normal tissue; and enhancing septa only, which were correlated with the histopathologic appearance of tumor cells streaming in the breast stroma (n = 1).

CONCLUSION. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma may be detected on MR imaging as solitary or multiple lesions that correspond to tumor morphology on pathologic examination. The appearance of multiple lesions or of enhancing fibroglandular breast elements on MR imaging is suggestive of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. K. Lopez and L. W. Bassett
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Spectrum of Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Findings1
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 165 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey
Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Ghai, D. Muradali, K. Bukhanov, and S. Kulkarni
Nonenhancing Breast Malignancies on MRI: Sonographic and Pathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Yeh, P. Slanetz, D. B. Kopans, E. Rafferty, D. Georgian-Smith, L. Moy, E. Halpern, R. Moore, I. Kuter, and A. Taghian
Prospective Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Palpable Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 868 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Inoue, T. Sano, R. Watai, R. Ashikaga, K. Ueda, M. Watatani, and Y. Nishimura
Dynamic Multidetector CT of Breast Tumors: Diagnostic Features and Comparison with Conventional Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, C. M. Kim, J. B. Kaplan, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, K. J. Van Zee, and D. D. Dershaw
MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.