AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bancroft, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bancroft, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, W. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 178:1255-1259
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Intramuscular Myxoma

Characteristic MR Imaging Features

Laura W. Bancroft1, Mark J. Kransdorf1, David M. Menke2, Mary I. O'Connor3 and William C. Foster4

1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224-3899.
2 Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224-3899.
3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224-3899.
4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1200 E. Broad St., P. O. Box 980153, Richmond, VA 23298.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to identify the characteristic MR imaging features of intramuscular myxoma.

MATERIALS AND MATERIALS. We retrospectively reviewed the MR imaging features of 20 patients with intramuscular myxoma. Clinical assessment included the age and sex of the patient and location of the tumor. Radiologic evaluation included the lesion size and shape, border definition, signal on T1- and T2-weighted or fluid-sensitive MR sequences, enhancement pattern, presence or absence of a fat rind, and presence or absence of increased signal in the adjacent muscle on T2-weighted or fluid-sensitive MR sequences.

RESULTS. The mean age of patients presenting with intramuscular myxoma was 61 years (range, 15-85 years; median, 64 years). The mean lesion size was 6.9 cm (range, 3-17 cm; median, 6.3 cm). A peritumoral fat rind was present in 13 of the patients (65%) with myxoma, and an increased signal in the adjacent muscle on fluid-sensitive sequences was present in 11 patients (55%). Intramuscular myxomas were homogeneously low in signal intensity on T1-weighted MR sequences in 19 patients (95%), with all lesions showing a high signal intensity on T2-weighted or fluid-sensitive MR sequences. Twelve of the myxomas had well-defined borders, and eight had borders that were partially ill defined. Of the 11 lesions imaged after gadolinium administration, six (55%) showed intense heterogeneous enhancement.

CONCLUSION. Findings of a mass that on MR images shows a perilesional fat rind, the signal intensity of fluid, and an increased signal in the adjacent muscle on T2-weighted or fluid-sensitive MR sequences are strongly suggestive of intramuscular myxoma. The degree of lesion enhancement varies but is most frequently intense and heterogeneous. Although the recognition of these features likely will not obviate biopsy of any individual lesion, it will allow more accurate prebiopsy diagnosis and preoperative planning.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. Girish, D. A. Jamadar, D. Landry, K. Finlay, J. A. Jacobson, and L. Friedman
Sonography of intramuscular myxomas: the bright rim and bright cap signs.
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2006; 25(7): 865 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. D. Murphey, L. K. Arcara, and J. Fanburg-Smith
From the Archives of the AFIP: Imaging of Musculoskeletal Liposarcoma with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1371 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Q. Ly, J. L. Bau, and D. P. Beall
Forearm Intramuscular Myxoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 960 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Murphey, G. A. McRae, J. C. Fanburg-Smith, H. T. Temple, A. M. Levine, and A. J. Aboulafia
Imaging of Soft-Tissue Myxoma with Emphasis on CT and MR and Comparison of Radiologic and Pathologic Findings
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.