AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 178:1499-1506
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Differentiation of Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma on Helical CT Scans

Jeong Kon Kim1, Tae Kyoung Kim1, Han Jong Ahn2, Chung Soo Kim2, Kyu-Rae Kim3 and Kyoung-Sik Cho1

1 Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea.
2 Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea.
3 Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, South Korea.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to differentiate subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed CT scans of four subtypes of renal cell carcinoma: 76 conventional (clear cell), 19 papillary, 13 chromophobe, and two collecting duct. Biphasic CT scans (unenhanced, corticomedullary, and excretory phase scans) were obtained in 61 patients, and monophasic CT scans (unenhanced and excretory phase scans) in 49. We compared patient age and sex; tumor size; degree and pattern (homogeneous, heterogeneous, predominantly peripheral) of enhancement; presence or absence of calcification; and tumor-spreading patterns including perinephric change, venous invasion, and lymphadenopathy in four subtypes.

RESULTS. Conventional renal carcinoma showed stronger enhancement than the other subtypes (p < 0.05): 106 ± 48 H (mean ± SD) in the corticomedullary phase and 62 ± 25 H in the excretory phase. The sensitivity and specificity for differentiating conventional renal carcinoma from the other subtypes were 74% and 100% when 84 H was used as the cutoff value in the corticomedullary phase and 84% and 91% when 44 H was used as the cutoff value in the excretory phase. Conventional (84%), papillary (74%), and collecting duct (100%) renal carcinomas tended to show heterogeneous or predominantly peripheral enhancement, whereas chromophobe renal carcinoma (69%) usually showed homogeneous enhancement. Calcification was more common in papillary (32%) and chromophobe (38%) renal carcinomas than in conventional renal carcinoma (11%) (p < 0.05). Perinephric change and venous invasion were not noted in chromophobe renal carcinoma, whereas both were common in collecting duct renal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION. For the differentiation of the subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, degree of enhancement is the most valuable parameter; enhancement pattern, the presence or absence of calcification, and tumor-spreading patterns can serve supplemental roles in the identification of the subtype of renal cell carcinoma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. E. Setlik, K. M. McCluskey, and J. A. McDavit
Best Cases from the AFIP: Renal Cell Carcinoma Manifesting as a Solitary Bone Metastasis
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2009; 29(7): 2184 - 2189.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. R. Oliva, J. N. Glickman, K. H. Zou, S. Y. Teo, K. J. Mortele, M. S. Rocha, and S. G. Silverman
Renal Cell Carcinoma: T1 and T2 Signal Intensity Characteristics of Papillary and Clear Cell Types Correlated with Pathology
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1524 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Mahadevia, A. Rozenblit, D. Milikow, and A. Marinovich
Renal-Adrenal Fusion: Instance of an Adrenal Adenoma Mimicking a Solid Renal Mass at CT--Case Report
Radiology, June 1, 2009; 251(3): 808 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli, N. M. Tannir, E. Jonasch, S. F. Matin, C. G. Wood, and C. M. Sandler
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation and Spectrum of Disease1
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 741 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. M. Yeh, R. Vikram, C. S. Ng, P. Tamboli, N. M. Tannir, E. Jonasch, S. F. Matin, C. G. Wood, and C. M. Sandler
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 755 - 757.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. R. M. Sun, L. Ngo, E. M. Genega, M. B. Atkins, M. E. Finn, N. M. Rofsky, and I. Pedrosa
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for Differentiation of Tumor Subtypes--Correlation with Pathologic Findings
Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 793 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, S. K. Kang, L. Wang, A. Touijer, and H. Hricak
Distribution of Renal Tumor Growth Rates Determined by Using Serial Volumetric CT Measurements
Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 137 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Yamada, M. Endo, M. Tsuboi, T. Matsuhashi, K. Takase, S. Higano, and S. Takahashi
Differentiation of Pathologic Subtypes of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma on CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2008; 191(5): 1559 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. S. Ng, C. G. Wood, P. M. Silverman, N. M. Tannir, P. Tamboli, and C. M. Sandler
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1220 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Dyer, D. J. DiSantis, and B. L. McClennan
Simplified Imaging Approach for Evaluation of the Solid Renal Mass in Adults
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S.-P. Lin, A. J. Bierhals, and J. S. Lewis Jr
Best Cases from the AFIP: Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1801 - 1807.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J M Garin, I Marco, A Salva, F Serrano, J M Bondia, and M Pacheco
CT and MRI in fat-containing papillary renal cell carcinoma
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): e193 - e195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill, L. Wang, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Russo, H. Eisenberg, and H. Hricak
Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S R Prasad, V R Narra, R Shah, P A Humphrey, J Jagirdar, J R Catena, N C Dalrymple, and C L Siegel
Segmental disorders of the nephron: histopathological and imaging perspective
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. G. Silverman, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, M. Jinzaki, and E. S. Cibas
Hyperattenuating Renal Masses: Etiologies, Pathogenesis, and Imaging Evaluation
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1131 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. A. Rosen and M. D. Schnall
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Tumor Vascularity and Vascular Effects of Targeted Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 770s - 776s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. R. Prasad, P. A. Humphrey, J. R. Catena, V. R. Narra, J. R. Srigley, A. D. Cortez, N. C. Dalrymple, and K. N. Chintapalli
Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1795 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Jinzaki, S. G. Silverman, A. Tanimoto, H. Shinmoto, S. Kuribayashi, J. K. Kim, and K.-S. Cho
Angiomyolipomas That Do Not Contain Fat Attenuation at Unenhanced CT * Drs Kim and Cho respond:
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 311 - 312.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. Chae, J. K. Kim, S. H. Kim, S.-J. Bae, and K.-S. Cho
Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Postoperative Recurrence Patterns
Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 189 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Ruppert-Kohlmayr, M. Uggowitzer, T. Meissnitzer, and G. Ruppert
Differentiation of Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Renal Papillary Carcinoma Using Quantitative CT Enhancement Parameters
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1387 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. K. Kim, S.-Y. Park, J.-H. Shon, and K.-S. Cho
Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Biphasic Helical CT
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.