AJR Not a Member? Click to Join ARRS!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hellerhoff, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rummeny, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hellerhoff, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rummeny, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:121-129
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Dynamic MR Pancreatography After Secretin Administration: Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy

Karin J. Hellerhoff1, Hermann Helmberger, III1, Thomas Rösch2, Marcus R. Settles1, Thomas M. Link1 and Ernst J. Rummeny1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 München, Germany.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, D-81675 München, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to assess the improvement of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of secretin-enhanced MR pancreatography compared with conventional MR pancreatography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ninety-five patients were studied with a 1.5-T scanner using a T2-weighted single-slice fast spin-echo sequence. Image quality and diameter of the head, body, and tail portion of the pancreatic main duct, the accessory duct, and the side branches were assessed before and after IV administration of secretin. Diagnoses before and after secretin administration were evaluated in a blinded fashion and correlated to the final diagnoses based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative results, and clinical follow-up as the reference standard.

RESULTS. In patients with a normal pancreatic duct, the visualization of all portions of the main pancreatic duct and the accessory duct was significantly improved with dynamic MR pancreatography (p <= 0.001). In patients with chronic pancreatitis, the visualization of the main duct was also significantly improved with dynamic MR pancreatography (p <= 0.05). However, the visualization of the minor duct and the side branches was significantly improved only in patients showing no ductal stricture (p <= 0.05), compared with those with ductal stricture (not significant). The overall sensitivity for the detection of chronic pancreatitis increased from 77% to 89% using secretin-enhanced MR pancreatography. A pancreas divisum was found in eight patients before and 13 patients after secretin administration. The overall negative predictive value of MR pancreatography increased from 84% to 98% after secretin administration.

CONCLUSION. Improvement in image quality after secretin stimulation increases the diagnostic value of MR pancreatography in patients with a normal or nondilated main pancreatic duct and may obviate invasive procedures such as ERCP.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. F. Akisik, A. M. Aisen, K. Sandrasegaran, S. G. Jennings, C. Lin, S. Sherman, J. A. Lin, and M. Rydberg
Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis: Utility of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with Secretin Enhancement
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 250(1): 103 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. F. Akisik, K. Sandrasegaran, A. A. Aisen, D. D. T. Maglinte, S. Sherman, and G. A. Lehman
Dynamic secretin-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 665 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Tamura, T. Ishibashi, and S. Takahashi
Chronic Pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for Quantitative Caliber Measurement and Qualitative Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 920 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Monill, J. Pernas, J. Clavero, A. Farre, A. Morales, M. Gonzalez, V. Artigas, and A. Martinez-Noguera
Pancreatic Duct After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Morphologic and Functional Evaluation with Secretin-Stimulated MR Pancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1267 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.