AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:33-37
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Computers in Radiology

Technologists' Productivity When Using PACS: Comparison of Film-Based Versus Filmless Radiography

Bruce I. Reiner1,2,3 and Eliot L. Siegel1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 N. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.
3 Present address: 6 Greenleaf Ln., Seaford, DE 19973.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of filmless operation and computed radiography on technologists' examination times compared with conventional film-based operation and film-screen radiography.

CONCLUSION. Compared with conventional film-screen operation, filmless operation using computed radiography was associated with a significant decrease in technologist examination times in the performance of general radiographic examinations. This decrease in technologist examination times in a filmless environment offers the potential for increased productivity with resulting personnel savings and improved operational efficiency.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. W. L. Boland
Enhancing CT Productivity: Strategies for Increasing Capacity
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. I. Reiner, D. Salkever, E. L. Siegel, F. J. Hooper, K. M. Siddiqui, and A. Musk
Multi-institutional Analysis of Computed and Direct Radiography: Part II. Economic Analysis
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 420 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. I. Reiner, E. L. Siegel, F. J. Hooper, K. M. Siddiqui, A. Musk, L. Walker, and A. Chacko
Multi-institutional Analysis of Computed and Direct Radiography: Part I. Technologist Productivity
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.