AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nghiem, H. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caoili, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nghiem, H. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:373-378
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Evaluation of Sonographically Guided Percutaneous Core Biopsy of Renal Masses

Elaine M. Caoili1, Ronald O. Bude, Ellen J. Higgins, Donna L. Hoff and Hanh V. Nghiem

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Taubman Center 2910R, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-9723.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to determine the utility of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy to evaluate renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of our imaging-guided procedures from January 1999 to June 2001. We performed 26 sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsies of renal masses in 26 patients. From two to five specimens were obtained from a single mass in each patient using an 18-gauge automated biopsy system. We examined the patients' medical records, pathology results, and imaging studies. Core biopsy results were compared with surgical pathology (n = 6) or clinical follow-up (n = 20).

RESULTS. All biopsies provided sufficient material for analysis. Biopsy findings were positive for malignancy in 19 (73%) of 26 masses. Histologic diagnoses included renal cell carcinoma were (n = 11), metastasis (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 2), and transitional cell carcinoma (n = 2). Specific cell type characterization could not be made on one biopsy, but the specimens were highly suspicious for malignancy. Biopsy revealed seven (27%) of 26 benign diagnoses: oncocytoma (n = 3), angiomyolipoma (n = 2), and fibrosis (n = 2). The average follow-up period for patients with benign diagnoses was 10 months. One case of surgically proven necrotic pyelonephritis was mischaracterized as fibrosis at core biopsy. Sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of malignancy. The core specimens yielded a specific diagnosis in 92% (24/26) of masses. No immediate complications occurred after the procedure. One patient developed a pseudoaneurysm that presented 3 months after the biopsy.

CONCLUSION. Sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy is a reliable and accurate method for evaluating renal masses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Heilbrun, R. J. Zagoria, A. J. Garvin, M. C. Hall, K. Krehbiel, A. Southwick, and P. E. Clark
CT-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Renal Tumors Before Treatment with Percutaneous Ablation
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1500 - 1505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. D. Beland, W. W. Mayo-Smith, D. E. Dupuy, J. J. Cronan, and R. A. DeLellis
Diagnostic Yield of 58 Consecutive Imaging-Guided Biopsies of Solid Renal Masses: Should We Biopsy All That Are Indeterminate?
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 792 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. E. Maturen, H. V. Nghiem, E. M. Caoili, E. G. Higgins, J. S. Wolf Jr., and D. P. Wood Jr.
Renal Mass Core Biopsy: Accuracy and Impact on Clinical Management
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 563 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, Y. U. Gan, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, and E. S. Cibas
Renal Masses in the Adult Patient: The Role of Percutaneous Biopsy
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 6 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Sheth, S. Ali, and E. Fishman
Imaging of renal lymphoma: patterns of disease with pathologic correlation.
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 1151 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. J. Rybicki, K. M. Shu, E. S. Cibas, J. R. Fielding, E. vanSonnenberg, and S. G. Silverman
Percutaneous Biopsy of Renal Masses: Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value Stratified by Clinical Setting and Size of Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1281 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.