AJR Customized AJR reprints in quantities as low as 100!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hulka, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Simeone, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hulka, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Simeone, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:379-383
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Sonographic Findings in Patients with Adenomyosis: Can Sonography Assist in Predicting Extent of Disease?

Carol A. Hulka1,2, Deborah A. Hall1, Kathleen McCarthy1 and Joseph Simeone1

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Cambridge Health Alliance, 1493 Cambridge St., Cambridge, MA 02139.

OBJECTIVE. We assessed whether specific sonographic characteristics are indicative of the extent of adenomyosis and whether fibroids alter this assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients' records were evaluated for the diagnosis of adenomyosis determined by hysterectomy and for sonography performed within 2 months of surgery. Seventy-three sonograms were evaluated by sonologists without knowledge of the extent of adenomyosis. Sonographic categories included visualization of the endometrium, presence of a diffuse uterine process, presence of fibroids, and normal findings. Pathologic results included mild, focal, and severe adenomyosis. Histologic and sonographic categories were correlated using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS. Forty-six specimens contained mild adenomyosis, 18 contained severe disease, and nine contained focal disease. Forty-one specimens contained fibroids. The endometrium was visualized in 10 cases of severe adenomyosis, seven cases of adenomyoma, and 35 cases of mild disease. Visualization of the endometrium did not relate to the severity of disease (p = 0.6). Of 18 cases of severe disease, 13 sonograms showed a diffuse process. Of nine cases of adenomyomas, no sonograms showed a diffuse process; and of 46 cases of mild disease, nine sonograms showed a diffuse process. A diffuse process was related to the severity of adenomyosis (p < 0.001). When fibroids were present, a diffuse process did not relate to the extent of adenomyosis (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION. In the absence of focal fibroids, a diffuse uterine process seen on sonography relates to the severity of adenomyosis. Fibroids limit the ability to diagnose the severity of adenomyosis. The visualization of the endometrium does not relate to the severity of adenomyosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Spielmann, C. Keogh, B. B. Forster, M. L. Martin, and L. S. Machan
Comparison of MRI and sonography in the preliminary evaluation for fibroid embolization.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Chopra, A. S. Lev-Toaff, F. Ors, and D. Bergin
Adenomyosis:common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2006; 25(5): 617 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.