AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lauenstein, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barkhausen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lauenstein, T. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barkhausen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:445-449
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Three-Dimensional Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold MR Imaging for Whole-Body Tumor Staging in Less Than 15 Minutes: A Feasibility Study

Thomas C. Lauenstein1, Susanne C. Goehde1, Christoph U. Herborn1, Wiebke Treder2, Stefan G. Ruehm1, Jörg F. Debatin1 and Jörg Barkhausen1

1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany.
2 Department of Internal Medicine and Cancer Research, University Hospital Essen, D-45122 Essen, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric interpolated breath-hold whole-body MR imaging using CT and nuclear medicine techniques as the standard of reference in patients with metastases.

CONCLUSION. The 3D volumetric interpolated breath-hold whole-body MR imaging examination for metastases screening correlates well with CT and scintigraphy. The use of the rolling table platform permits rapid whole-body imaging in an average of 11 min. The preliminary results indicate that the described technique has the potential to emerge as an all-encompassing alternative to conventional multimodality tumor staging strategies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Graves, R. T. Black, and D. J. Lomas
Constrained Surface Controllers for Three-dimensional Image Data Reformatting
Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 218 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Lin, A. Luciani, K. Belhadj, P. Maison, A. Vignaud, J.-F. Deux, P. Zerbib, F. Pigneur, E. Itti, H. Kobeiter, et al.
Patients with Plasma Cell Disorders Examined at Whole-Body Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging: Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Brauck, M. O. Zenge, F. M. Vogt, H. H. Quick, F. Stock, T. Trarbach, M. E. Ladd, and J. Barkhausen
Feasibility of Whole-Body MR with T2- and T1-weighted Real-time Steady-State Free Precession Sequences during Continuous Table Movement to Depict Metastases
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kataoka, H. Ueda, T. Koyama, S. Umeoka, K. Togashi, R. Asato, S. Tanaka, and J. Ito
Contrast-Enhanced Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination Compared with Spin-Echo T1-Weighted Imaging of Head and Neck Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Lauenstein, S. C. Goehde, C. U. Herborn, M. Goyen, C. Oberhoff, J. F. Debatin, S. G. Ruehm, and J. Barkhausen
Whole-Body MR Imaging: Evaluation of Patients for Metastases
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. Antoch, F. M. Vogt, L. S. Freudenberg, F. Nazaradeh, S. C. Goehde, J. Barkhausen, G. Dahmen, A. Bockisch, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruehm
Whole-Body Dual-Modality PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI for Tumor Staging in Oncology
JAMA, December 24, 2003; 290(24): 3199 - 3206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.