AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engelke, C.
Right arrow Articles by Belli, A.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engelke, C.
Right arrow Articles by Belli, A.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:619-623
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

Using 6-mm Cutting Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Resistant Peripheral Artery Stenosis: Preliminary Results

Christoph Engelke1,2, Caron Sandhu1, Robert A. Morgan1 and Anna-Maria Belli1

1 Department of Radiology, St. George's Hospital, Blackshaw Rd., London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of 6-mm Cutting Balloon angioplasty in patients with resistant peripheral stenoses caused by neointimal hyperplasia or irradiation-induced arteriopathy in vascular territories that are not amenable for use of the smaller Cutting Balloons that are used in cardiology.

CONCLUSION. Peripheral Cutting Balloon angioplasty with the new 6-mm Cutting Balloon device proved useful in the short term for treatment of peripheral arterial stenoses resistant to conventional angioplasty.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Dick, S. Sabeti, W. Mlekusch, O. Schlager, J. Amighi, M. Haumer, M. Cejna, E. Minar, and M. Schillinger
Conventional Balloon Angioplasty versus Peripheral Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis: Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Amighi, M. Schillinger, P. Dick, O. Schlager, S. Sabeti, W. Mlekusch, M. Haumer, R. Mathies, G. Heinzle, A. Schuster, et al.
De Novo Superficial Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: Peripheral Cutting Balloon Angioplasty and Restenosis Rates--Randomized Controlled Trial
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.