AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bogaert, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:901-910
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Improved Visualization of Coronary Arteries Using a New Three-Dimensional Submillimeter MR Coronary Angiography Sequence with Balanced Gradients

Benedetta Giorgi1, Steven Dymarkowski1, Frederik Maes2, Marc Kouwenhoven3 and Jan Bogaert1

1 Department of Radiology, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Catholic University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
2 ESAT-PSI, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Catholic University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
3 Philips Medical Systems, Veenpluis 4-6, 5680 DA Best, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. The goal of our study was to evaluate a new three-dimensional real-time navigator MR coronary angiography sequence to noninvasively visualize the coronary arteries.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MR coronary angiography with a new balanced turbo field-echo sequence in comparison with the standard turbo field-echo sequence. Signal-to-noise, blood-to-myocardium, blood-to-fat, and blood-to-pericardial fluid contrast ratios of the left and right coronary artery systems were measured. Image quality was graded, the length and diameter of the coronary arteries were measured, and the number of visible side branches was assessed.

RESULTS. The balanced turbo field-echo images yielded a higher blood-to-myocardium and blood-to-pericardial fluid contrast ratio, a similar blood-to-fat contrast ratio, and a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the turbo field-echo images. On a 5-point grading scale (1, nondiagnostic or unreadable; 2, poor; 3, moderate; 4, good; 5, excellent), image quality was rated significantly better for the balanced turbo field-echo sequence than for the turbo field-echo sequence (left coronary artery, 4.0 ± 0.6 vs 3.6 ± 0.5 [p = 0.015]; right coronary artery, 4.4 ± 0.4 vs 3.6 ± 0.4 [p < 0.0001], respectively), resulting in a significantly longer segment of the three major coronary arteries visualized (left anterior descending coronary artery, 92 ± 21 mm vs 79 ± 24 mm; left circumflex coronary artery, 70 ± 7 mm vs 60 ± 18 mm; right coronary artery, 112 ± 28 mm vs 95 ± 27 mm) and a significantly higher number of side branches visualized (left anterior descending coronary artery, 2.9 ± 1.3 vs 1.5 ± 1.3; left circumflex coronary artery, 2.1 ± 1.7 vs 1.0 ± 1.2; right coronary artery, 3.7 ± 1.7 vs 2.6 ± 1.5). Mean imaging time per coronary artery was significantly shorter for the balanced turbo field-echo sequence (5.7 ± 1.0 min) than for the turbo field-echo sequence (8.4 ± 1.4 min) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION. Compared with standard turbo field-echo MR coronary angiography, optimized balanced turbo field-echo MR coronary angiography improves the visualization of the coronary arteries and their side branches within a significantly shorter imaging time.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Ozgun, A. Hoffmeier, M. Kouwenhoven, R. M. Botnar, M. Stuber, H. H. Scheld, W. J. Manning, W. Heindel, and D. Maintz
Comparison of 3D Segmented Gradient-Echo and Steady-State Free Precession Coronary MRI Sequences in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 103 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, B. Schnackenburg, A. Bornstedt, R. Gebker, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel
Coronary MR Angiography with Steady-State Free Precession: Individually Adapted Breath-hold Technique versus Free-breathing Technique
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 669 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Spuentrup, M. Katoh, A. Buecker, W. J. Manning, T. Schaeffter, T.-H. Nguyen, H. P. Kuhl, M. Stuber, R. M. Botnar, and R. W. Gunther
Free-breathing 3D Steady-State Free Precession Coronary MR Angiography with Radial k-Space Sampling: Comparison with Cartesian k-Space Sampling and Cartesian Gradient-Echo Coronary MR Angiography--Pilot Study
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 581 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.