AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nuñez, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rybicki, F.
Right arrow Articles by Nuñez, D. B., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:933-937
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Skin and Thyroid Dosimetry in Cervical Spine Screening: Two Methods for Evaluation and a Comparison Between a Helical CT and Radiographic Trauma Series

Frank Rybicki1, Richard D. Nawfel, Philip F. Judy, Stephen Ledbetter, Rebecca L. Dyson, Peter S. Halt, Kirstin M. Shu and Diego B. Nuñez, Jr.

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. The first objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that estimates of radiation dose from an ionization chamber correspond to thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements in patients with suspected cervical spine injury. The second objective was to compare the radiation dose of a protocol using helical CT of the entire cervical spine with that of a protocol using radiography alone.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements of radiation dose to the skin over the thyroid were made in two patient groups: six patients evaluated with CT of the cervical spine and six patients evaluated with radiography. The skin dose for both groups was estimated with an ionization chamber, and the thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements and ionization chamber estimates of skin dose were compared for both groups. Using the ionization chamber, we estimated the radiation dose to the thyroid for all 12 patients. With these estimates, we computed the ratios of skin dose and thyroid dose (CT / radiography).

RESULTS. Thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements correlated with ionization chamber estimates of skin dose in both patient groups. Using the ionization chamber estimates, we found that CT delivered 26.0 mGy to the thyroid. In the patients evaluated with radiography, the mean thyroid dose was 1.80 mGy (95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.55 mGy). Ionization chamber dose ratios (CT / radiography) for the skin and thyroid were 9.69 and 14.4 mGy, respectively.

CONCLUSION. The correlation between the ionization chamber estimates and the thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements supports the use of ionization chamber estimates in future research. Although helical CT of the entire cervical spine is cost-effective in patients at high risk for fracture, the greater than 14-fold increase in the radiation dose to the thyroid emphasizes the importance of clinical stratification to identify patients at high risk for fracture and the judicious use of CT in patients with suspected cervical spine injury.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Biswas, J. E. Bible, M. Bohan, A. K. Simpson, P. G. Whang, and J. N. Grauer
Radiation Exposure from Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomographic Scans
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2009; 91(8): 1882 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
J. Blackham and J. Benger
`Clearing' the cervical spine in conscious trauma patients
Trauma, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 93 - 109.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Wee, J. H Reynolds, and A. Bleetman
Imaging after trauma to the neck
BMJ, January 19, 2008; 336(7636): 154 - 157.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. D. MacKenzie, J. Nazario-Larrieu, T. Cai, M. S. Ledbetter, M. A. Duran-Mendicuti, P. F. Judy, and F. J. Rybicki
Reduced-Dose CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1371 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
B. K. Kwon, A. R. Vaccaro, J. N. Grauer, C. G. Fisher, and M. F. Dvorak
Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2006; 14(2): 78 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
G. Y. El-Khoury, D. L. Bennett, and G. J. Ondr
Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2004; 12(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
CT Versus Radiography for Initial Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma: What Is the Standard of Care?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 911 - 915.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.