HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kwon, D. S. Articles by Kleinman, P. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kwon, D. S. Articles by Kleinman, P. K. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Physiologic Subperiosteal New Bone Formation: Prevalence, Distribution, and Thickness in Neonates and Infants

¹ Department of Radiology and Imaging Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, UMass Memorial Health Care, 55 Lake Ave. N., Worcester, MA 01655.
² Present address: Department of Radiology, Hallmark Health—Melrose Wakefield Campus, 585 Lebanon St., Melrose, MA 02176.
³ Present address: Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.
⁴ Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. N., Worcester, MA 01655.
⁵ Present address: Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital—Boston, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence, distribution, and thickness of physiologic subperiosteal new bone formation in neonates and infants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. High-detail postmortem skeletal radiologic surveys of 101 neonates and infants who had died from sudden infant death syndrome were reviewed. The average age at the time of death was 2.6 months (range, 2 weeks—8 months 2 weeks). The location, distribution, and thickness of subperiosteal new bone formation of the long bones were noted and measured with an ocular magnification system.

RESULTS. subperiosteal new bone formation was identified in 35 infants (35%), all of whom were between 1 and 4 months of age. The prevalence of subperiosteal new bone formation involving one or more bones was 37% for ages 1-2 months, 55% for ages 2-3 months, and 35% for ages 3-4 months. subperiosteal new bone formation involved the tibia in 29 infants (bilateral involvement in 19) and the femurs in 14 infants (bilateral involvement in 11). The humerus was a site of subperiosteal new bone formation in 12 infants; the ulna, in seven infants; and the radius, in two infants. The thickness of the subperiosteal new bone formation was never more than 1.8 mm, and the average thickness for the various long bones ranged from 0.7 to 0.9 mm.

CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that subperiosteal new bone formation is a common finding in infants 1-4 months of age. It is potentially an abnormal finding in neonates (CI = 0.0, 0.007) and in infants older than 4 months of age (CI = 0.0, 0.003). A thickness of 2 mm or more in subperiosteal new bone formation is likely to be abnormal and should prompt further diagnostic evaluation.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. S. Rana, J. S. Wu, and R. L. Eisenberg Periosteal Reaction Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2009; 193(4): W259 - W272. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. N. Sankar, J. Weiss, and D. L. Skaggs Orthopaedic Conditions in the Newborn J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2009; 17(2): 112 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Chapman Non-accidental injury Imaging, December 1, 2004; 16(2): 161 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]