| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Division of Pediatric Radiology, 1905 McGovern-Davison Children's Health
Center, Box 3808, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center,
Erwin Rd., Durham, NC 22710.
2 General Electric Medical Systems, 3000 N. Grandview Blvd., Waukesha, WI
53188.
3 Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 3333 Burnet
Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229.
4 Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Hospital
and Health Sciences Centre, 855 W. 12th Ave., Vancouver, Canada V5Z 1M9.
OBJECTIVE. Limiting CT radiation dose is especially critical when imaging children. The purpose of our study was to modify and test an accurate and safe tool for evaluating systematic dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT (MDCT) in pediatric patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. After validating the computer-simulation technique with a water phantom, we subjected the original digital scanning data for 26 contrast-enhanced abdominal MDCT scans (120 mA) obtained in infants and children (age range, 1 month-9 years; mean age, 3.1 years) to simulated tube current reduction (100, 80, 60, and 40 mA) by adding noise. this procedure created four additional examinations per child that were identical to the originals except for image noise. The 130 examinations were scored randomly, independently, and without prior knowledge of the children's diagnoses by three radiologists for depiction of high-visibility structures, such as adrenal glands and fat in the intrahepatic falciform ligament, and low-visibility structures, such as the extrahepatic hepatic artery, small intrahepatic vessels, and common bile duct. Aligned rank and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests were used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS. Simulated tube current reduction significantly affected the detection of low-visibility structures (p < 0.001). Reduced detection in low-visibility structures was evident at a level less than or equal to 80 mA. No loss of detection in high-visibility structures was found at any tube current level (p > 0.5).
CONCLUSION. The results of this computer simulation suggest that accurate abdominal MDCT can be performed in pediatric patients using substantially reduced radiation, depending on the indication for imaging. (In our case, the reduction was between 33% and 67%, depending on whether a high-visibility or low-visibility structure was being assessed.) This simulation technology can be applied to MDCT of other organ systems for systematic evaluation of radiation dose reduction.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. E. Arch and D. P. Frush Pediatric Body MDCT: A 5-Year Follow-Up Survey of Scanning Parameters Used by Pediatric Radiologists Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Honnef, J. E. Wildberger, G. Haras, C. Hohl, G. Staatz, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality with Use of a Patient Image Gallery for Dose Reduction in Pediatric 16-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 467 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. K. Paulson, C. Weaver, L. M. Ho, L. Martin, J. Li, J. Darsie, and D. P. Frush Conventional and Reduced Radiation Dose of 16-MDCT for Detection of Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 151 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Hoe, E. Samei, D. P. Frush, and D. M. Delong Simulation of Liver Lesions for Pediatric CT Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2381050477. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Funama, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, K. Kakei, N. Nagasue, M. Shimamura, N. Sato, S. Sultana, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita Radiation Dose Reduction without Degradation of Low-Contrast Detectability at Abdominal Multisection CT with a Low-Tube Voltage Technique: Phantom Study Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 905 - 910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. R. Fefferman, E. Bomsztyk, A. M. Yim, R. Rivera, J. B. Amodio, L. P. Pinkney, N. A. Strubel, M. E. Noz, and H. Rusinek Appendicitis in Children: Low-Dose CT with a Phantom-based Simulation Technique--Initial Observations Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 641 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M A Lewis and S Edyvean Patient dose reduction in CT Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 880 - 883. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Chapman, M. Kalra, E. Halpern, B. Grottkau, M. Albright, and D. Jaramillo 16-MDCT of the Posttraumatic Pediatric Elbow: Optimum Parameters and Associated Radiation Dose Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 516 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Irie and H. Inoue Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric CT: Effect of Technical Factors and Phantom Size and Shape Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 515 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, A. R. Schleipman, and S. G. Silverman Patient Radiation Dose at CT Urography and Conventional Urography Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 126 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A J Britten, M Crotty, H Kiremidjian, A Grundy, and E J Adam The addition of computer simulated noise to investigate radiation dose and image quality in images with spatial correlation of statistical noise: an example application to X-ray CT of the brain Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2004; 77(916): 323 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. D. Cody, D. M. Moxley, K. T. Krugh, J. C. O'Daniel, L. K. Wagner, and F. Eftekhari Strategies for Formulating Appropriate MDCT Techniques When Imaging the Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis in Pediatric Patients Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 849 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Siegel Multiplanar and Three-dimensional Multi-Detector Row CT of Thoracic Vessels and Airways in the Pediatric Population Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 641 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Mayo, J. Aldrich, and N. L. Muller Radiation Exposure at Chest CT: A Statement of the Fleischner Society Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
