AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhargavan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhargavan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:1123-1128
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Workload of Radiologists in the United States in 1998-1999 and Trends Since 1995-1996

Mythreyi Bhargavan1 and Jonathan H. Sunshine

1 Both authors: Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr., Reston, VA 20191.

OBJECTIVE. This article measures the workload of radiologists in the United States in 1998-1999, its variation by practice characteristics, and changes since 1995-1996.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data on procedures performed were collected from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey of Practices, and responses were weighted to make them representative of all radiologists in the United States. Workload measured as number of procedures per full-time equivalent diagnostic radiologist was tabulated by practice type, size, setting, and location and compared with corresponding survey results from 1995-1996. The independent effect of these factors on workload was measured using regression analysis. Changes in procedure complexity were calculated in terms of relative value units (RVUs) per procedure using Medicare files.

RESULTS. In 1998-1999, the average workload per full-time equivalent diagnostic radiologist had increased 8.5% since 1995-1996 to 12,800 (standard error = 200) procedures annually, with substantial variation by group type. For example, the average workload was 9400 procedures in academic groups and 13,600 in nonacademic private radiology practices. Even in relatively homogeneous categories of practices, radiologists at the 75th percentile of workload were typically performing at least 50% more procedures than radiologists at the 25th percentile. Average RVUs per Medicare procedure increased by 4% between 1995 and 1998, mainly because of an increase in the share of more complex techniques such as MR imaging and CT in the procedure mix.

CONCLUSION. The workload per radiologist measured in procedures and RVUs increased substantially between 1995-1996 and 1998-1999. Because much variation remains unexplained, averages or medians should not be used as norms.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Meghea and J. H. Sunshine
Retirement patterns and plans of radiologists.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1405 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sunshine, and C. Meghea,
How could the radiologist shortage have eased?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): 1160 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. S. Lewis, J. H. Sunshine,, and M. Bhargavan
A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W456 - W468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani
Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Merewitz and J. H. Sunshine
A Portrait of Pediatric Radiologists in the United States
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 12 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sunshine, R. S. Lewis, and M. Bhargavan
A Portrait of Interventional Radiologists in the United States
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1103 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine
Workload of Radiologists in the United States in 2002-2003 and Trends Since 1991-1992
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 920 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. T. Bramson and G. A. Taylor
SOS: Can We Save Pediatric Radiology?
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 719 - 722.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Bhargavan and J. H. Sunshine
Utilization of Radiology Services in the United States: Levels and Trends in Modalities, Regions, and Populations
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 824 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Vertinsky and B. Forster
Prevalence of Eye Strain Among Radiologists: Influence of Viewing Variables on Symptoms
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 681 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hogan and J. H. Sunshine
Financial Ratios in Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Variability and Trends
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 774 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. D. Saketkhoo, J. H. Sunshine, A. M. Covey, and H. P. Forman
Findings in 2002 from a Help Wanted Index of Job Advertisements: Is the Job-Market Shortage of Diagnostic Radiologists Easing?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.