AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sonin, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hatem, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sonin, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hatem, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:1159-1166
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Grading Articular Cartilage of the Knee Using Fast Spin-Echo Proton Density-Weighted MR Imaging Without Fat Suppression

Andrew H. Sonin1,2,3, Raymond A. Pensy1, Michael E. Mulligan1 and Stephen Hatem1,4

1 Department of Radiology, University of Maryland, 22 S. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201-1595.
2 Present address: Radiology Imaging Associates, 8200 E. Belleview Ave., Ste. 124, Greenwood Village, CO 80111.
3 Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 4200 E. Ninth St., Denver, CO 80262.
4 Present address: Department of Radiology (A-21), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195-5021.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this work was to determine the accuracy of fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee using arthroscopy as a gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed MR images of the knee in 54 patients for whom arthroscopic results were available. All MR imaging studies included fast spin-echo proton density-weighted coronal and axial sequences as part of our routine protocol. Evaluation of the articular surfaces was performed by three independent observers who were unaware of the arthroscopic results. The cartilage surfaces were graded using a 3-point system, and results were compared with arthroscopic findings.

RESULTS. Of 324 cartilage surfaces evaluated, arthroscopy showed 241 surfaces as normal, 56 as containing partial-thickness defects, and 27 as containing full-thickness defects. Compared with arthroscopic data, sensitivity of MR imaging for the three reviewers was 59-73.5%; specificity, 86.7-90.5%; positive predictive value, 60.5-72.6%; negative predictive value, 86.0-90.8%; and accuracy, 79.6-86.1%. Interobserver variability for the presence of disease, which was measured using the kappa statistic, was 0.63.

CONCLUSION. Fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging sequences can be used to evaluate the cartilage of the knee with accuracy comparable to that of previously reported cartilage-specific sequences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Kijowski, K. W. Davis, M. A. Woods, M. J. Lindstrom, A. A. De Smet, G. E. Gold, and R. F. Busse
Knee Joint: Comprehensive Assessment with 3D Isotropic Resolution Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging--Diagnostic Performance Compared with That of Conventional MR Imaging at 3.0 T
Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 486 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Kijowski, D. G. Blankenbaker, J. L. Klaers, K. Shinki, A. A. De Smet, and W. F. Block
Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Steady-State Free Precession Imaging of the Knee: Diagnostic Performance Compared with Conventional MR
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Kijowski, D. G. Blankenbaker, K. W. Davis, K. Shinki, L. D. Kaplan, and A. A. De Smet
Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluating the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint
Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. E. Gold, R. F. Busse, C. Beehler, E. Han, A. C. S. Brau, P. J. Beatty, and C. F. Beaulieu
Isotropic MRI of the Knee with 3D Fast Spin-Echo Extended Echo-Train Acquisition (XETA): Initial Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1287 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. R. Duc, P. Koch, M. R. Schmid, W. Horger, J. Hodler, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann
Diagnosis of Articular Cartilage Abnormalities of the Knee: Prospective Clinical Evaluation of a 3D Water-Excitation True FISP Sequence
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K.-P. Jungius, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, P. Koch, and C. W. A. Pfirrmann
Cartilaginous Defects of the Femorotibial Joint: Accuracy of Coronal Short Inversion Time Inversion-Recovery MR Sequence
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 482 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Kijowski, P. Stanton, J. Fine, and A. De Smet
Subchondral Bone Marrow Edema in Patients with Degeneration of the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint
Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 943 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. P. Recht, D. W. Goodwin, C. S. Winalski, and L. M. White
MRI of Articular Cartilage: Revisiting Current Status and Future Directions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 899 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. N. Masi, C. A. Sell, C. Phan, E. Han, D. Newitt, L. Steinbach, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link
Cartilage MR Imaging at 3.0 versus That at 1.5 T: Preliminary Results in a Porcine Model
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 140 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Magee and D. Williams
Detection of Meniscal Tears and Marrow Lesions Using Coronal MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1469 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Roth, J. Jacobson, D. Jamadar, E. Caoili, Y. Morag, and J. Housner
Quadriceps Fat Pad Signal Intensity and Enlargement on MRI: Prevalence and Associated Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2004; 182(6): 1383 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. H. Haims, A. E. Moore, M. E. Schweitzer, W. B. Morrison, D. Deely, R. W. Culp, and H. P. Forman
MRI in the Diagnosis of Cartilage Injury in the Wrist
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1267 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Mohr, F. W. Roemer, H. K. Genant, C. Liess, and A. Sonin
Using Fat-Saturated Proton Density-Weighted MR Imaging to Evaluate Articular Cartilage
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 280 - 282.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.