AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Forcier, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Forcier, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:1179-1184
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy of Radial Scars of the Breast: When Is Excision Necessary?

R. James Brenner1,2, Roger J. Jackman3, Steve H. Parker4, W. Phil Evans, III5, Liane Philpotts6, Beth M. Deutch7, Mary C. Lechner8, Daniel Lehrer9, Paul Sylvan10, Rebecca Hunt11, Steven J. Adler12 and Nancy Forcier13

1 Tower—St. John's Imaging, Joyce Eisenberg Keefer Breast Center, John Wayne Cancer Institute, St. John's Hospital and Health Center, 1328 22nd St., Santa Monica, CA 90404.
2 Department of Radiology, UCLA School of Medicine, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Rm. 165-47, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Palo Alto Medical Clinic, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94301.
4 Sally Jobe Breast Center, Radiology Imaging Associates, 1001 E. Layton Ave., Englewood, CO 90110-7017.
5 Susan G. Komen Breast Center, 3535 Worth St., Ste. 340, Dallas, TX 75246.
6 Department of Radiology, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520-8042.
7 Jacqueline M. Wilentz Comprehensive Breast Center, Monmouth Medical Center, 300 Second Ave., Long Branch, NJ 07740.
8 Department of Radiology, Jane Brattain Breast Center, Park Nicollet Medical Center, 3900 Park Nicollet Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416.
9 CERIM, Instutucion De Avanzada, Pionera en el Diagnstico, De Las Enfermedades Mamarias, Azcuenaga 970, (1115) Buenos Aires, Argentina.
10 La Jolla Radiology, Ste. B, 7301 Girard Ave., La Jolla, CA 92037.
11 Health Science Center-Breast Division, University of Arizona Medical Center, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724.
12 Mammography Section, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave. C5-XR, Seattle, WA 98111.
13 Mission Breast Center, c/o 456 28241 Crown Valley Pkwy., Ste. F, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677.

OBJECTIVE. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of cases of radial scar diagnosed by percutaneous core needle biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Of 198 nonpalpable lesions diagnosed with radial scars found at core needle biopsy, 157 lesions constituting the study group had undergone surgical excision (n = 102) or mammographic surveillance after biopsy for at least 24 months (median, 38 months; n = 55). Mammographic lesion type, lesion size, biopsy guidance method, biopsy device, number of specimens per lesion, and presence of atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. Results were compared with histologic findings at surgery or mammographic findings during surveillance.

RESULTS. Carcinoma was found at excision in 28% (8/29) of lesions with associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy and 4% (5/128) of lesions without associated atypia (p < 0.0001). In the latter group, carcinoma was found at excision in 3% (2/60) of masses, 8% (3/40) of architectural distortions, and 0% (0/28) of microcalcification lesions. Malignancy was missed in 9% (5/58) of lesions biopsied with a spring-loaded device and in 0% (0/70) of lesions biopsied with a directional vacuum-assisted device (p = 0.01); and in 8% (5/60) of lesions sampled with less than 12 specimens per lesion and 0% (0/68) sampled with 12 or more specimens (p = 0.015). Lesion type, maximal lesion diameter, and type of imaging guidance (stereotactic or sonographic) were not significant factors in determining the presence of malignancy.

CONCLUSION. Diagnosis of radial scar based on core needle biopsy is likely to be reliable when there is no associated atypical hyperplasia at percutaneous biopsy, when the biopsy includes at least 12 specimens, and when mammographic findings are reconciled with histologic findings. When the lesion diagnosed by core needle biopsy as radial scar does not meet these criteria, excisional biopsy is indicated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. R. Skandarajah, L. Field, A. Y. L. Mou, M. Buchanan, J. Evans, S. Hart, and G. B. Mann
Benign Papilloma on Core Biopsy Requires Surgical Excision
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2008; 15(8): 2272 - 2277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A. G Douglas-Jones, J. L Denson, A. C Cox, I. B Harries, and G. Stevens
Radial scar lesions of the breast diagnosed by needle core biopsy: analysis of cases containing occult malignancy
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2007; 60(3): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. F. Dillon, E. W. McDermott, A. D. Hill, A. O'Doherty, N. O'Higgins, and C. M. Quinn
Predictive Value of Breast Lesions of "Uncertain Malignant Potential" and "Suspicious for Malignancy" Determined by Needle Core Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 704 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Sydnor, J. D. Wilson, T. A. Hijaz, H. D. Massey, and E. S. Shaw de Paredes
Underestimation of the Presence of Breast Carcinoma in Papillary Lesions Initially Diagnosed at Core-Needle Biopsy
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 58 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, C. Tornos, R. Huzjan, L. Bartella, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw
Is Surgical Excision Warranted After Benign, Concordant Diagnosis of Papilloma at Percutaneous Breast Biopsy?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1328 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg
Sonographically Depicted Breast Clustered Microcysts: Is Follow-Up Appropriate?
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 952 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. S. Burnside, D. L. Rubin, R. D. Shachter, R. E. Sohlich, and E. A. Sickles
A Probabilistic Expert System That Provides Automated Mammographic-Histologic Correlation: Initial Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
M Kennedy, A V Masterson, M Kerin, and F Flanagan
Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review
J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 56(10): 721 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. C. Gombos, R. J. Poppiti Jr., and R. J. Brenner
Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy of Radial Scars of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 275 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. K. Gill, O. B. Ioffe, and W. A. Berg
When Is a Diagnosis of Sclerosing Adenosis Acceptable at Core Biopsy?
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Jackman and F. A. Marzoni Jr.
Stereotactic Histologic Biopsy with Patients Prone: Technical Feasibility in 98% of Mammographically Detected Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 785 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.