AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Panicek, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Panicek, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:1205-1208
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Clinical Usefulness of Imaging Performed After CT Angiography That Was Negative for Pulmonary Embolus in a High-Risk Oncologic Population

Michelle S. Ginsberg1,2, Jeanna Oh1,2, Adam Welber1,3 and David M. Panicek1,2

1 Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.
2 Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.
3 Present address: Department of Radiology, Danbury Hospital, 24 Hospital Ave., Danbury, CT 06810.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence and types of additional imaging examinations that were performed, and whether anticoagulation therapy was started or continued, after CT angiography showed no pulmonary embolus in a high-risk oncologic population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the radiology report for each CT angiogram that was obtained for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism at our institution (a tertiary cancer center) during a 25-month period. The radiology information system was then searched for any additional confirmatory radiologic examinations performed within 2 days after a negative finding on CT angiography. Medical records were reviewed to determine whether anticoagulation therapy was started or continued despite a negative finding on CT angiography.

RESULTS. Two hundred seventy-six CT angiograms were obtained in 260 oncology patients who were clinically suspected of having pulmonary embolism. The findings from 203 CT angiograms (74%) were interpreted as negative; 56 (20%), as positive; and 17 (6%), as equivocal for pulmonary embolism. Fifty-eight patients (21%) with negative findings on CT angiography subsequently underwent additional imaging, the results of which were potentially clinically important in 6% of the patients. Six patients began to receive and two continued to undergo anticoagulation therapy despite negative findings on CT angiography; three of the six patients received anticoagulation for new-onset atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION. Negative results of CT angiography for pulmonary embolism did not deter referring physicians from ordering other confirmatory imaging tests in 21% of patients in a high-risk oncologic population. Those additional tests rarely revealed results that might have been clinically important.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani
Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Daftary, M. Gregory, A. Daftary, J. P. Seibyl, and S. Saluja
Chest Radiograph as a Triage Tool in the Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 132 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. C. Kavanagh, A. O'Hare, G. Hargaden, and J. G. Murray
Risk of Pulmonary Embolism After Negative MDCT Pulmonary Angiography Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 499 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.