AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karabulut, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tallaksen, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karabulut, N.
Right arrow Articles by Tallaksen, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:1225-1233
© American Roentgen Ray Society


MR Imaging of the Chest Using a Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold Modified Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Technique: Comparison with Two-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Technique and Multidetector CT

Nevzat Karabulut1, Diego R. Martin, Ming Yang and Robert J. Tallaksen

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, P. O. Box 9235, Morgantown, WV 26505-9235.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing MR imaging of the chest using a fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced modified three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo technique with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold (VIB) sequence compared with using a standard two-dimensional (2D) breath-hold gradient-echo technique. MR images obtained using both techniques were compared with multidetector CT (MDCT) scans.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Paired gadolinium-enhanced 2D gradient-echo and 3D gradient-echo VIB images were acquired in 15 consecutive patients with suspected intrathoracic abnormalities. MDCT scans were available for comparison in 12 patients. Two reviewers independently analyzed the MR images obtained using the two techniques for overall quality, the degree of artifacts, and visibility of mediastinal or parenchymal abnormalities. The detectability of lesions on the 3D gradient-echo VIB images and 2D gradient-echo images was compared with the detectability of lesions on CT scans obtained in nine patients.

RESULTS. In all cases, the MR images obtained using the 3D gradient-echo technique with the VIB sequence were rated superior to those obtained using the 2D gradient-echo technique for quality, depiction of mediastinal structures, and clarity of pulmonary vessels and central airways. On the 3D gradient-echo VIB images, the degree of phase artifacts was lower (p < 0.001), but the degree of pixel graininess was higher (p < 0.05). Detectability, confidence and conspicuity levels, and marginal delineation of the pulmonary lesions were rated higher statistically on the 3D gradient-echo VIB images than on the 2D gradient-echo images. Of the 31 solid pulmonary abnormalities depicted on MDCT, 27 (87.1%) were detected on the 3D gradient-echo VIB images, and 21 (67.7%) were seen on the 2D gradient-echo images (p < 0.05). The 3D gradient-echo VIB images showed all 14 mediastinal lesions (100%) seen on MDCT, whereas the 2D gradient-echo images showed 12 (85.7%) of the 14 lesions (p >= 0.05).

CONCLUSION. The gadolinium-enhanced modified 3D gradient-echo technique with the VIB sequence provides MR images that are superior in quality, have significantly fewer artifacts, and have a higher sensitivity for the detection of intrathoracic lesions compared with images obtained using the standard 2D gradient-echo technique.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Y. Donmez, E. Yekeler, V. Saeidi, A. Tunaci, M. Tunaci, and G. Acunas
Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Patterns of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on 3D Gradient-Recalled Echo MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kataoka, H. Ueda, T. Koyama, S. Umeoka, K. Togashi, R. Asato, S. Tanaka, and J. Ito
Contrast-Enhanced Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination Compared with Spin-Echo T1-Weighted Imaging of Head and Neck Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Vogt, C. U. Herborn, P. Hunold, T. C. Lauenstein, T. Schroder, J. F. Debatin, and J. Barkhausen
HASTE MRI Versus Chest Radiography in the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison with MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 71 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.