AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebeskind, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Langlotz, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liebeskind, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Langlotz, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:1395-1399
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Using Sonography to Examine Adult Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Have Usage Patterns Changed with the Expansion of Managed Care?

Marc E. Liebeskind1,2, Peter H. Arger1, Amy Liebeskind3, Keith Maston1 and Curtis Langlotz1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Present address: Park Avenue Radiologists, 525 Park Ave., New York, NY 10021.
3 Department of Radiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 E. 77th St., New York, NY 10021.

OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to determine whether significant changes have occurred in the utilization of sonography relative to more expensive cross-sectional imaging techniques in adult patients during a time of increasing reliance on managed care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Use of sonography was compared with use of CT and MR imaging of the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum in adult patients in 1993 and 1998 at an academic medical center. Clinicians who requested the greatest number of examinations in both years were surveyed to assess their perception of changes in their practice patterns during the interim.

RESULTS. Between 1993 and 1998, the use of sonography relative to the other cross-sectional imaging modalities decreased from 56% to 43% (p <= 0.001). During the same time, CT use increased from 30% to 41% (p <= 0.001), and MR imaging use increased from 14% to 16% (p <= 0.001). Survey responses indicated that potential cost saving was not a major factor in physicians' decisions to use sonography rather than other cross-sectional imaging modalities.

CONCLUSION. Sonographic utilization decreased during a 5-year period in which managed care provided an increasingly large proportion of overall reimbursement. Cost did not appear to be a major factor in selection of diagnostic tests. Differences over time in refering clinicians' perception of the relative usefulness of sonography, CT, and MR imaging may have contributed to the change in usage patterns.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Matin, D. W. Bates, A. Sussman, P. Ros, R. Hanson, and R. Khorasani
Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 7 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Hoffmann and L. D. Greenbaum
The Future Is Not the Sonoscope * Reply
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2003; 22(9): 997 - 1000.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.