AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiner, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Hooper, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2002; 179:1407-1410
© American Roentgen Ray Society


PACS in Radiology

Accuracy of Interpretation of CT Scans: Comparing PACS Monitor Displays and Hard-Copy Images

Bruce I. Reiner1,2, Eliot L. Siegel1,2 and Frank J. Hooper1

1 Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, 10 N. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201.
2 Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative diagnostic accuracy of radiologists in the interpretation of CT scans using a computer workstation in comparison with using film.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four board-certified radiologists with extensive soft-copy experience interpreted 117 CT scans in four anatomic regions using films displayed on an alternator and images displayed on a four-monitor workstation. The radiologists were asked to interpret the scans in their usual fashion and were aware that both the time required to review the study and the accuracy of the reports were being assessed. The radiologists' diagnostic impressions were compared with those of a consensus panel and scored for accuracy.

RESULTS. Soft-copy interpretation using computer workstations was found to produce statistically significant improvement in combined measurements of sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for chest, brain, and chest—abdominal CT scans compared with film interpretation.

CONCLUSION. PACS (picture archiving and communication system) offers radiologists the potential for improved accuracy in CT interpretation compared with traditional film-based interpretation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. M. Wong, A. N. Lees, J. Louw, F. Y. Lee, N. French, K. Gain, C. P. Murray, A. Wilson, and D. C. Chambers
Emphysema in young adult survivors of moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2008; 32(2): 321 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. P. Krestin, J. C. Miller, S. J. Golding, G. G. Frija, G. M. Glazer, H. G. Ringertz, and J. H. Thrall
Reinventing Radiology in a Digital and Molecular Age: Summary of Proceedings of the Sixth Biannual Symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology (IS3R), August 25 27, 2005
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 633 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Wittram
How I Do It: CT Pulmonary Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1255 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M.-J. Lee, S. Kim, S.-A. Lee, H.-T. Song, Y.-M. Huh, D.-H. Kim, S. H. Han, and J.-S. Suh
Overcoming Artifacts from Metallic Orthopedic Implants at High-Field-Strength MR Imaging and Multi-detector CT
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 791 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. M. Wardlaw, A. J. Farrall, D. Perry, R. von Kummer, O. Mielke, T. Moulin, A. Ciccone, M. Hill, and for the Acute Cerebral CT Evaluation of Stroke Stu
Factors Influencing the Detection of Early CT Signs of Cerebral Ischemia: An Internet-Based, International Multiobserver Study
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1250 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. B. McCarville, H. M. Lederman, V. M. Santana, N. C. Daw, S. J. Shochat, C.-S. Li, and R. A. Kaufman
Distinguishing Benign from Malignant Pulmonary Nodules with Helical Chest CT in Children with Malignant Solid Tumors.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 514 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. E. Roos, B. Chilla, M. Zanetti, M. Schmid, P. Koch, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, and J. Hodler
MRI of Meniscal Lesions: Soft-Copy (PACS) and Hard-Copy Evaluation Versus Reviewer Experience.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 786 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S P Prabhu, S Gandhi, and P R Goddard
Ergonomics of digital imaging
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2005; 78(931): 582 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Scharitzer, M. Prokop, M. Weber, M. Fuchsjager, E. Oschatz, and C. Schaefer-Prokop
Detectability of Catheters on Bedside Chest Radiographs: Comparison between Liquid Crystal Display and High-Resolution Cathode-Ray Tube Monitors
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 611 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J G Cahir, A H Freeman, and H M Courtney
Multislice CT of the abdomen
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(suppl_1): S64 - S73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. A. Haider
Extending PowerPoint with DICOM Image Support
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1683 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. D. Johnson
Hard- versus Soft-Copy Interpretation
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 629 - 630.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.