AJR ARRS Membership
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuhrman, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuhrman, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gur, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2002; 179:1551-1553
© American Roentgen Ray Society

Observer Performance Studies: Detection of Single Versus Multiple Abnormalities of the Chest

Carl R. Fuhrman1, Cynthia A. Britton1, Thomas Bender1, Jules H. Sumkin1, Manuel L. Brown2, J. Michael Holbert3, Thomas S. Chang1, Howard E. Rockette4 and David Gur1

1 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582.
2 Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202.
3 Department of Radiology, Scott & White Clinic, Tempe, TX 76508.
4 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582.

OBJECTIVE. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare two methods of evaluating observer performance in detecting an abnormality on chest radiographs. In the first method, the abnormality in question, rib fracture, was one of five investigated, and it was the only one of interest in the second.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eight experienced observers viewed 117 posteroanterior chest radiographs in two interpretation modes. Fifty-four of these images depicted rib fractures that had been rated as subtle for detection. The likelihood of the presence of a rib fracture was rated as one of five abnormalities in question in one mode and the sole abnormality of interest in the other mode.

RESULTS. Six of the observers performed better during the single-abnormality mode, one performed equally well in both modes, and one performed better during the multiple-abnormality mode. The average area under the ROC curves (Az) was 0.73 ± 0.07 for the multiple-abnormality mode and 0.80 ± 0.04 for the single-abnormality mode. The results were significantly different (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION. Study methodology can significantly affect the results in ROC studies, particularly for abnormalities that may not be perceived as primary or important. The order in which abnormalities appear on a checklist report form may be important.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.