AJR ARRS: Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Ooijen, P. M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Oudkerk, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Ooijen, P. M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Oudkerk, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:223-226
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Computers in Radiology

Noninvasive Coronary Imaging Using Electron Beam CT: Surface Rendering Versus Volume Rendering

P. M. A. van Ooijen1, R. J. M. van Geuns2, B. J. W. M. Rensing2, A. H. H. Bongaerts1, P. J. de Feyter2 and M. Oudkerk1

1 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rotterdam, Thoraxcentre, P. O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE. Three-dimensional data for noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries are acquired from electron beam CT, multidetector CT, or MR imaging. Most commonly, surface rendering is used for three-dimensional processing, but recent advances in hardware and software technology have made it possible to use volume rendering. Our objective was to compare volume rendering with surface rendering for the visualization of the coronary artery tree.

CONCLUSION. Our experience in the comparison of both techniques shows that because of intrinsic problems associated with surface rendering, volume rendering produces better image quality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. C. Dalrymple, S. R. Prasad, M. W. Freckleton, and K. N. Chintapalli
Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Introduction to the Language of Three-dimensional Imaging with Multidetector CT
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1409 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.