| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstra. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of multidetector CT (MDCT) angiography with volume rendering for estimating the patency of renal artery stents.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In 16 patients, 16 renal artery stents were evaluated with MDCT renal angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CT data were evaluated using multiplanar volume reformations and the volume-rendering algorithm with three different volume-rendered parameter settings (low-to-high, high-to-low, and high—low—high opacity transfer functions: VRLH, VRHL, and VRVE, respectively). Targeted images of each stent were rendered in paraaxial and paracoronal planes and were interactively interpreted. The overall restenosis severity was measured on postprocessed paraaxial and paracoronal images and compared with that obtained on DSA using linear regression analysis. Image quality and lumen delineation on rendered images were also compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
RESULTS. Eight restenoses were identified on DSA. Correlations between restenosis severity measured with DSA and those measured with MDCT were significant (p < 0.001). Volume rendering with VRHL allowed the best correlation with DSA (reviewer 1, r2 = 0.86; reviewer 2, r2 = 0.94) and was significantly better than multiplanar volume reformations (p = 0.028). Overall image quality was high with all rendering techniques and with no significant differences (p > 0.59, for all comparisons). Stent lumen was well delineated with volume-rendering modalities; however, VRHL was significantly better than VRLH (p = 0.033).
CONCLUSION. Volume-rendered MDCT angiography enabled high-quality three-dimensional reproducible evaluation of the patency of implanted renal artery stents. Volume rendering with VRHL achieved the best performance.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. C. Josephs, H. A. Rowley, G. D. Rubin, and for Writing Group 3 Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Vascular Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomographic Imaging Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2837 - 2844. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Rieger, A. Mallouhi, T. Tauscher, M. Lutz, and W. R. Jaschke Traumatic Arterial Injuries of the Extremities: Initial Evaluation with MDCT Angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 656 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. T. Johnson and E. K. Fishman IV Contrast Selection for MDCT: Current Thoughts and Practice Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 406 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Morvay, E. Nagy, R. Bagi, G. Abraham, R. Sipka, and A. Palko Sonographic Follow-up After Visceral Artery Stenting J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2004; 23(8): 1057 - 1064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sheth and E. K. Fishman Multi-Detector Row CT of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract: Techniques and Applications in the Diagnosis of Benign Diseases RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): e20 - e20. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
