|
|
||||||||
1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare volume rendering and maximum intensity projection as postprocessing techniques of MR angiography in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography studies performed in 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated by two independent reviewers who were unaware of digital subtraction angiography findings, the standard of reference. Panoramic maximum-intensity-projection and volume-rendered angiograms were produced from each data set to investigate the presence of underlying aneurysms. Each detected aneurysm was then interactively evaluated with subvolume maximum-intensity-projection and targeted volume-rendering algorithms to evaluate aneurysm morphology and size. Aneurysm detection and characterization were evaluated by means of the receiver operating characteristic analysis, and aneurysm size was evaluated using the limits-of-agreement method. Image quality, aneurysm neck depiction, and vascular delineation were also compared between maximum-intensity-projection and volume-rendered images. The time required for the generation and interpretation of maximum-intensity-projection and volume-rendered images was assessed.
RESULTS. Volume rendering tended to improve the diagnostic
confidence (Az [area under the receiver operating
characteristic curve] = 0.95 vs Az = 0.90 for maximum
intensity projection) and yielded a considerable improvement in sensitivity
(89% vs 71% for maximum intensity projection), particularly in the detection
of small cerebral aneurysms. Regarding aneurysm morphology, volume rendering
performed significantly better than maximum intensity projection in lobulation
detection (p < 0.001) and slightly better in neck categorization
(p > 0.238). Limits-of-agreement analysis showed a trend toward
improved assessment of the aneurysm size by volume rendering (-0.31 ±
1.62 mm vs -1.27 ± 2.84 mm by maximum intensity projection). Overall
image quality and vascular delineation of involved vessels on volume-rendered
images were rated better than that obtained by maximum intensity projections
(p
0.007 and p
0.001, respectively). Evaluation of
time-of-flight MR angiography data sets was significantly facilitated with
volume rendering (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION. The volume-rendering technique facilitates the evaluation of cerebral time-of-flight MR angiography data sets and allows better detection and more reliable characterization of intracranial aneurysms than does maximum intensity projection.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ries, S. Siemonsen, G. Thomalla, U. Grzyska, H. Zeumer, and J. Fiehler Long-Term Follow-Up of Cerebral Aneurysms after Endovascular Therapy Prediction and Outcome of Retreatment AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1755 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Papke, C. K. Kuhl, M. Fruth, C. Haupt, M. Schlunz-Hendann, D. Sauner, M. Fiebich, A. Bani, and F. Brassel Intracranial Aneurysms: Role of Multidetector CT Angiography in Diagnosis and Endovascular Therapy Planning Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 532 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Dachman Advice for Optimizing Colonic Distention and Minimizing Risk of Perforation during CT Colonography. Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 317 - 321. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Persson, N Dahlstrom, O Smedby, and T B Brismar Volume rendering of three-dimensional drip infusion CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: a retrospective study Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2005; 78(936): 1078 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bash, J. P. Villablanca, R. Jahan, G. Duckwiler, M. Tillis, C. Kidwell, J. Saver, and J. Sayre Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Tomandl, N. C. Kostner, M. Schempershofe, W. J. Huk, C. Strauss, L. Anker, and P. Hastreiter CT Angiography of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Focus on Postprocessing RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 637 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Dachman and M. E. Zalis Quality and Consistency in CT Colonography and Research Reporting Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 319 - 323. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |