| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet
Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039.
2 Department of Radiology, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
27710.
3 Computed Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA 23513.
4 Radiologia Pediatrica, Hospital Materno-Infantil Vall d'He, pg. Vall d'Hebron
119-129, E-08-35, Barcelona, Spain.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the amount of radiation dose reduction and its effect on image quality when using an in-plane bismuth breast shield for multidetector CT (MDCT) of the chest and abdomen in female pediatric patients.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty consecutive MDCT examinations (chest, 29; abdomen, 21) of female pediatric patients (mean age, 9 years; range, 2 months-18 years) were performed with a 2-ply (1.7 g of bismuth per square centimeter) bismuth shield (three sizes to accommodate patients of varying sizes) overlying the patient's breasts. MDCT images were evaluated for a perceptible difference in image quality in the lungs at the anatomic level under the shield as compared with nonshielded lung and whether the images were of diagnostic quality. In addition, 2-mm regions of interest were placed in the peripheral anterior and posterior portions of each lung in shielded and nonshielded areas, and noise (standard deviation in Hounsfield units) was measured in the regions. Differences among the regions in noise were compared for shielded versus nonshielded areas (paired t test). To measure differences in actual dose, we also evaluated the breast shield with an infant anthropomorphic phantom using thermoluminescent detectors in the breast tissue. The phantom was imaged with and without the breast shield using identical MDCT parameters.
RESULTS. All MDCT scans of patients were of diagnostic quality with no perceptible difference in image quality in shielded versus nonshielded lung. We found no statistically significant difference in noise between the shielded and nonshielded lung regions of interest (shielded: mean noise, 17.3 H; nonshielded: mean noise, 18.8 H; p = 0.5180). Phantom measurements revealed a 29% reduction in radiation dose to the breast when a medium-dose MDCT protocol was used.
CONCLUSION. Bismuth in-plane breast shielding for pediatric MDCT decreased radiation dose to the breast without qualitative or quantitative changes in image quality.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Matsuoka, A. R. Hunsaker, R. R. Gill, I. B. Oliva, B. Trotman-Dickenson, F. L. Jacobson, and H. Hatabu Vascular Enhancement and Image Quality of MDCT Pulmonary Angiography in 400 Cases: Comparison of Standard and Low Kilovoltage Settings Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1651 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kim, T. T. Yoshizumi, D. P. Frush, C. Anderson-Evans, and G. Toncheva DOSIMETRIC CHARACTERISATION OF BISMUTH SHIELDS IN CT: MEASUREMENTS AND MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS Radiat Prot Dosimetry, March 5, 2009; (2009) ncp025v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Mayo and J. A. Leipsic Radiation Dose in Cardiac CT Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 646 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Mayo Radiation Dose Issues in Longitudinal Studies Involving Computed Tomography Proceedings of the ATS, December 15, 2008; 5(9): 934 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Ngaile, C. B. S. Uiso, P. Msaki, and R. Kazema Use of lead shields for radiation protection of superficial organs in patients undergoing head CT examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry, July 1, 2008; 130(4): 490 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Honnef, J. E. Wildberger, G. Haras, C. Hohl, G. Staatz, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality with Use of a Patient Image Gallery for Dose Reduction in Pediatric 16-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 467 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Coursey, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, G. Toncheva, G. Nguyen, and S. B. Greenberg Pediatric Chest MDCT Using Tube Current Modulation: Effect on Radiation Dose with Breast Shielding Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): W54 - W61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E V Kennedy, G R Iball, and D S Brettle Investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Warren-Forward, P. Cardew, B. Smith, L. Clack, K. McWhirter, S. Johnson, and K. Wessel A COMPARISON OF DOSE SAVINGS OF LEAD AND LIGHTWEIGHT APRONS FOR SHIELDING OF 99m-TECHNETIUM RADIATION Radiat Prot Dosimetry, May 24, 2007; (2007) ncm176v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. T. Yoshizumi, P. C. Goodman, D. P. Frush, G. Nguyen, G. Toncheva, M. Sarder, and L. Barnes Validation of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Technology for Organ Dose Assessment During CT: Comparison with Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1332 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Schueller-Weidekamm, C. M. Schaefer-Prokop, M. Weber, C. J. Herold, and M. Prokop CT Angiography of Pulmonary Arteries to Detect Pulmonary Embolism: Improvement of Vascular Enhancement with Low Kilovoltage Settings Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 899 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Hurwitz, T. T. Yoshizumi, R. E. Reiman, E. K. Paulson, D. P. Frush, G. T. Nguyen, G. I. Toncheva, and P. C. Goodman Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1718 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M A Lewis and S Edyvean Patient dose reduction in CT Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 880 - 883. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Donnelly Reducing Radiation Dose Associated with Pediatric CT by Decreasing Unnecessary Examinations Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 655 - 657. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Hohl, A. H. Mahnken, E. Klotz, M. Das, A. Stargardt, G. Muhlenbruch, T. Schmidt, R. W. Gunther, and J. E. Wildberger Radiation Dose Reduction to the Male Gonads During MDCT: The Effectiveness of a Lead Shield Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 128 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. P. Frush, L. F. Donnelly, and N. S. Rosen Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know Pediatrics, October 1, 2003; 112(4): 951 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Donnelly, J. Lucaya, V. Ozelame, D. P. Frush, P. J. Strouse, T. E. Sumner, and H. J. Paltiel CT Findings and Temporal Course of Persistent Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema in Neonates: A Multiinstitutional Study Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1129 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
