AJR InPractice
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugita, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugita, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:467-471
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pseudolesion of the Bile Duct Caused by Flow Effect: A Diagnostic Pitfall of MR Cholangiopancreatography

Reiji Sugita1, Eriko Sugimura1, Michiaki Itoh1, Toshihiro Ohisa1, Syouki Takahashi2 and Naotaka Fujita3

1 Department of Radiology, Nippon Telephone and Telegraph East Tohoku Hospital, 2-29-1, Yamatomachi, Wakabayashi-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryocho, Aoba-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Sendai City Medical Center, 5-22-1, Turugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai City, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.

OBJECTIVE. Our objective was to examine the influence of the shape of imaged structures and the velocity of flow on the appearance of flow artifacts seen on MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in a phantom model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three types of phantoms representing the biliary system were constructed. The first phantom type was a straight tube; the second, a single tube in which the inlet and outlet diameters varied by a ratio of as much as 1:6; and the third, a tube that simulated a stricture in the biliary system and a gallstone. All experiments were repeated three times.

RESULTS. We did not observe any flow artifacts in the experiments we performed with the straight tubes. A higher rate of flow resulted in decreased signal intensity in tubes simulating bile ducts; the decreased signal was most likely to be observed on images in which the speed of flow exceeded 5 mm/sec. Flow artifacts were seen only if the ratio between the inlet and outlet diameters was 1:4 or greater. Simulations of bile duct abnormalities—such as a 50% stricture or the presence of a gallstone—did not produce any flow artifacts.

CONCLUSION. In our experiments, a flow artifact could be seen on images in which the ratio between the inlet and the outlet diameters in the phantom was equal to or greater than 1:4. This finding indicates that a flow artifact could be observed in dilated bile ducts on MRCP under clinical conditions. Knowing that a pseudo—filling defect can be caused by a flow artifact should help to prevent misinterpretation of MRCP images.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. C. Silva, J. L. Friese, A. K. Hara, and P. T. Liu
MR Cholangiopancreatography: Improved Ductal Distention with Intravenous Morphine Administration
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 677 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.