HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mueller, G. C. Articles by Francis, I. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mueller, G. C. Articles by Francis, I. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Characterizing Small Hepatic Lesions: Routine Versus Expert Interpretation

¹ All authors: Department of Radiology/MRI B2B311, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of MR imaging characterization of small (2 cm) hepatic lesions made in a routine clinical setting with the effectiveness of such characterization made under standardized conditions by radiologists who are expert interpreters of MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-eight patients with 69 small (2 cm) hepatic lesions considered indeterminate on a prior routine CT scan were included in the study. The diagnosis for all lesions had been verified by histology (n = 10), surgery and intraoperative sonography (n = 5), imaging follow-up (n = 35), or clinical follow-up (n = 19). Using the initial radiology reports, the diagnoses based on MR imaging were rated on a 5-point confidence scale. In addition, two radiologists experienced in MR imaging who were unaware of the initial interpretations of the images or the clinical histories of the patients independently analyzed the MR imaging studies and characterized the lesions using the same 5-point scale. The observer performance for the initial MR imaging interpretations and the expert interpretations were measured using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Interobserver agreement was determined with weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS. Fifty-eight lesions were benign (six cysts, 22 hemangiomas, four regenerating nodules, two steatohepatitic lesions, one atypical blood vessel, three focal fat and five focal fat-sparing lesions, 13 flow-related pseudolesions, one diaphragmatic insertion, and one unspecified lesion), and 11 lesions were malignant (nine metastases and two hepatocellular carcinoma). The areas under the curve were 0.94 (initial reports), 0.88 (observer 1), and 0.84 (observer 2). Substantial agreement was found between the expert interpreters ( = 0.74), and moderate agreement, between the expert interpreters and initial interpreters ( = 0.44 each).

CONCLUSION. MR imaging is an effective method of characterizing small (2 cm) hepatic lesions in routine clinical practice.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Willatt, H. K. Hussain, S. Adusumilli, and J. A. Marrero MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Challenges and Controversies Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 311 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Patterson, H. I. Khalil, and D. M. Panicek MRI evaluation of small hepatic lesions in women with breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 307 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. I. Khalil, S. A. Patterson, and D. M. Panicek Hepatic Lesions Deemed Too Small to Characterize at CT: Prevalence and Importance in Women with Breast Cancer Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 872 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]