AJR Get Involved! Join ARRS Today
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:737-744
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Usefulness of Barium Studies for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Strictures of the Esophagus

Sonya Gupta1, Marc S. Levine1, Stephen E. Rubesin1, David A. Katzka2 and Igor Laufer1

1 Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
2 Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our investigation was to determine the usefulness of barium studies for differentiating benign and malignant strictures of the esophagus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A search of radiology and endoscopy files revealed 100 patients with esophageal strictures on barium studies who underwent endoscopy (with endoscopic brushings or biopsy specimens in 57). The images from these barium studies were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who were unaware of the clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic findings; these observers classified the strictures as having a benign, malignant, or equivocal appearance. The radiographic data were correlated with the endoscopic and pathologic findings to determine the usefulness of barium studies for differentiating benign strictures from malignant tumor.

RESULTS. Of the 100 esophageal strictures detected on barium studies, 75 (75%) had a benign radiographic appearance, 11 (11%) had a malignant appearance, and 14 (14%) had an equivocal appearance. None of the 75 patients with radiographically benign strictures had malignant tumor on endoscopy, which revealed benign strictures in 48 patients and no definite strictures in the remaining 27. Conversely, all 11 patients (100%) with radiographically malignant strictures had malignant tumor on endoscopy. Finally, 13 (93%) of 14 patients with radiographically equivocal strictures had benign strictures without tumor on endoscopy and one (7%) had esophageal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION. Radiographically benign esophageal strictures are not found to be caused by malignant tumor on endoscopy, so these patients can be treated medically before endoscopy or endoscopic dilatation procedures are performed. However, radiographically malignant or equivocal strictures require early endoscopy and biopsy for a definitive diagnosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, and I. Laufer
Barium Studies in Modern Radiology: Do They Have a Role?
Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 18 - 22.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.