AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Metser, U.
Right arrow Articles by Boerner, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Metser, U.
Right arrow Articles by Boerner, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 180:765-769
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Original Report

MR Imaging Findings and Patterns of Spread in Secondary Tumor Involvement of the Uterine Body and Cervix

Ur Metser1, Masoom A. Haider1, Korosh Khalili1 and Scott Boerner2

1 Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network—Mount Sinai Hospitals, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
2 Department of Pathology, University Health Network—Mount Sinai Hospital, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.

OBJECTIVE. Our study sought to describe the MR imaging features and the patterns of spread in secondary tumor involvement of the uterus by nonuterine tumors.

CONCLUSION. Direct extension of an adjacent tumor to the uterus is the most common pattern of secondary tumor involvement. Concomitant invasion of other pelvic organs is also typical. Although less common, hematogenous or lymphatic metastases to the uterus are encountered in clinical practice. Metastases should be added to the differential diagnosis of apparently malignant masses in the uterine body or cervix, especially in patients with metastatic disease or in patients whose uterus shows a preserved shape with involvement by an infiltrative heterogeneously enhancing process.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. Tamai, K. Togashi, T. Ito, N. Morisawa, T. Fujiwara, and T. Koyama
MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnostic Pitfalls
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 21 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.