AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorio, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shock, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorio, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shock, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 180:929-934
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Using a Saline Chaser to Decrease Contrast Media in Abdominal CT

Paul J. Dorio1, Fred T. Lee, Jr., Kevin P. Henseler, Mark Pilot, Myron A. Pozniak, Thomas C. Winter, III and Sarah A. Shock

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792-3252.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare hepatic tumor conspicuity on CT after injection of either 150 mL of contrast material or 100 mL of contrast material plus a 50-mL saline chaser.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We evaluated 86 hypoattenuating liver metastases in 26 patients. Patients underwent CT in two sessions separated by a mean of 85 days: one time with 150 mL of contrast material and the other time with 100 mL of contrast material followed by a 50-mL saline chaser. The order of the sessions was randomized. Contrast material was administered via power injector and matched for injection rate and delay time. Attenuation values were obtained from normal liver tissue and metastases and from the spleen, kidney, aorta, and inferior vena cava.

RESULTS. The 150 mL dose of contrast material caused slightly greater liver and tumor attenuation than 100 mL of contrast material with a chaser (mean hepatic attenuation, 95.6 vs 89.8 H, respectively; p < 0.03, paired t test; mean tumor attenuation, 53.2 vs 49.1 H, respectively; r = 0.71, p = 0.09). The difference in conspicuity of liver lesions was slightly greater with 150 mL than with 100 mL with a chaser (46.8 H vs 44.2 H; r = 0.46, p = 0.08, paired t test), but was of doubtful clinical significance (2.6 H). Kidney, spleen, and vascular structures enhanced more with 150 mL than with 100 mL and a chaser.

CONCLUSION. Using 100 mL of contrast material and a saline chaser did not result in a meaningful difference in liver parenchyma attenuation or lesion conspicuity compared with using 150 mL of contrast medium alone. Routine use of a chaser for abdominal CT may yield cost savings and a decreased risk of contrast nephropathy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. Kim, T. H. Kim, S. J. Kim, D. P. Kim, C. S. Oh, Y. H. Ryu, Y. J. Kim, and B. W. Choi
Saline Flush Effect for Enhancement of Aorta and Coronary Arteries at Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 110 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. S. Boss, R. V. Olmos, M. Sinaasappel, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H. M. Schellens
Application of PET/CT in the Development of Novel Anticancer Drugs
Oncologist, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 25 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. M. Ho, R. C. Nelson, and D. M. DeLong
Determining Contrast Medium Dose and Rate on Basis of Lean Body Weight: Does This Strategy Improve Patient-to-Patient Uniformity of Hepatic Enhancement during Multi-Detector Row CT?
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 431 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
F Tatsugami, M Matsuki, Y Inada, G Nakai, M Tanikake, S Yoshikawa, and I Narabayashi
Usefulness of saline pushing in reduction of contrast material dose in abdominal CT: evaluation of time-density curve for the aorta, portal vein and liver
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 231 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. H. Lee, J. M. Goo, H. J. Lee, K. G. Kim, J.-G. Im, and K. T. Bae
Determination of Optimal Timing Window for Pulmonary Artery MDCT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 313 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Orlandini, S. Boini, S. Iochum-Duchamps, T. Batch, X. Zhu, and A. Blum
Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Awai, A. Hatcho, Y. Nakayama, S. Kusunoki, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, M. Denbo, N. Sato, and Y. Yamashita
Simulation of Aortic Peak Enhancement on MDCT Using a Contrast Material Flow Phantom: Feasibility Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. J. Jeong, K. S. Lee, S. Y. Jeong, M. J. Chung, S. S. Shim, H. Kim, O J. Kwon, and S. Kim
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Characterization with Combined Wash-in and Washout Features at Dynamic Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 675 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita
Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Beyer, G. Antoch, S. Muller, T. Egelhof, L. S. Freudenberg, J. Debatin, and A. Bockisch
Acquisition Protocol Considerations for Combined PET/CT Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2004; 45(90010): 25S - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.