|
|
||||||||
1 cm) Detected at Population-Based CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Reliable High-Resolution CT Features of Benign Lesions
1 Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi,
Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
2 Department of Radiology, JA Azumi General Hospital, 3207-1 Ikeda, Nagano
399-8695, Japan.
OBJECTIVE. We assessed thin-section CT features specific to benignity in solitary pulmonary nodules of 1 cm or smaller that were detected at population-based CT screening for lung cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two reviewers independently made qualitative (presence or absence of lobulation, spiculation, air bronchogram, cavity, satellite lesions, pleural tag, concave margins, polygonal shape, and peripheral subpleural lesion) and quantitative (lesion size, percentage of ground-glass opacity areas, and two- and three-dimensional ratios of lesion) assessments in CT images of 72 nodules (25 lung cancers, seven atypical adenomatous hyperplasias, and 40 benign lesions). Optimal criteria specific to benignity were studied.
RESULTS. The prevalence of polygonal shape (p = 0.005 and p = 0.019, reviewer 1 and reviewer 2), peripheral subpleural lesion (p = 0.011 and p = 0.033), a predominantly solid lesion (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), and three-dimensional ratios (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) were greater in benign lesions than in malignancies. The prevalence of a predominantly solid lesion (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) was greater in benign lesions than in atypical adenomatous hyperplasias, and the prevalence of a peripheral subpleural lesion (p = 0.004 and p = 0.012) was greater in atypical adenomatous hyperplasias than in malignancies. Using a single CT feature, polygonal shape and a three-dimensional ratio of greater than 1.78 showed 100% specificity for both reviewers. Among all combinations of CT findings specific to benignity, a combined criterion of a predominantly solid lesion and peripheral subpleural lesion or polygonal shape or the three-dimensional ratio attained the highest sensitivity (63% and 60%) for both reviewers.
CONCLUSION. A combined criterion of CT features was optimal for predicting benign pulmonary lesions.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Xu, H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen, M. Oudkerk, Y. Wang, R. Vliegenthart, E. T. Scholten, J. Verschakelen, M. Prokop, H. J. de Koning, and R. J. van Klaveren Smooth or Attached Solid Indeterminate Nodules Detected at Baseline CT Screening in the NELSON Study: Cancer Risk during 1 Year of Follow-up Radiology, November 4, 2008; (2008) 2493070847. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Veronesi, M. Bellomi, P. Scanagatta, L. Preda, C. Rampinelli, J. Guarize, G. Pelosi, P. Maisonneuve, F. Leo, P. Solli, et al. Difficulties encountered managing nodules detected during a computed tomography lung cancer screening program J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, R. J. van Klaveren, H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen, G. H. de Bock, H. A. Gietema, D. M. Xu, A. L. M. Leusveld, H. J. de Koning, E. T. Scholten, J. Verschakelen, et al. Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 625 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Gierada, T. K. Pilgram, M. Ford, R. M. Fagerstrom, T. R. Church, H. Nath, K. Garg, and D. C. Strollo Lung Cancer: Interobserver Agreement on Interpretation of Pulmonary Findings at Low-Dose CT Screening Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 265 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Wahidi, J. A. Govert, R. K. Goudar, M. K. Gould, and D. C. McCrory Evidence for the Treatment of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 94S - 107S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Markowitz, A. Miller, J. Miller, A. Manowitz, S. Kieding, L. Sider, and A. Morabia Ability of Low-Dose Helical CT To Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant Noncalcified Lung Nodules Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1028 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Park, J. M. Goo, H. J. Lee, C. H. Lee, E. J. Chun, and J.-G. Im Nodular Ground-Glass Opacity at Thin-Section CT: Histologic Correlation and Evaluation of Change at Follow-up RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Ko, C. C. Roberts, W. G. Berger, and F. S. Chew Imaging Evaluation of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3_Supplement): S1 - S4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nie, Q. Li, F. Li, Y. Pu, D. Appelbaum, and K. Doi Integrating PET and CT Information to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Lung Nodules: A Semiautomatic Computer-Aided Method J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1075 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. MacMahon, J. H. M. Austin, G. Gamsu, C. J. Herold, J. R. Jett, D. P. Naidich, E. F. Patz Jr, and S. J. Swensen Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 395 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. Travis, K. Garg, W. A. Franklin, I. I. Wistuba, B. Sabloff, M. Noguchi, R. Kakinuma, M. Zakowski, M. Ginsberg, R. Padera, et al. Evolving Concepts in the Pathology and Computed Tomography Imaging of Lung Adenocarcinoma and Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3279 - 3287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, S. Sone, H. Abe, H. MacMahon, and K. Doi Malignant versus Benign Nodules at CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Comparison of Thin-Section CT Findings Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 793 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, M. Aoyama, J. Shiraishi, H. Abe, Q. Li, K. Suzuki, R. Engelmann, S. Sone, H. MacMahon, and K. Doi Radiologists' Performance for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Lung Nodules on High-Resolution CT Using Computer-Estimated Likelihood of Malignancy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1209 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D R Baldwin, J D Birchall, R H Ganatra, and K S Pointon Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: clinical management, role of CT and nuclear medicine Imaging, October 1, 2004; 16(1): 22 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |