AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sohaib, S. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reznek, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sohaib, S. A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reznek, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 180:1297-1304
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Characterization of Adnexal Mass Lesions on MR Imaging

S. A. Aslam Sohaib1,2, Ahju Sahdev1, Philippe Van Trappen3, Ian J. Jacobs3 and Rodney H. Reznek1

1 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, England, United Kingdom.
2 Academic Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd., Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom.
3 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, EC1A 7BE, England, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of MR imaging in the detection and characterization of adnexal mass lesions and to determine which imaging features are predictive of malignancy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively performed MR imaging in 104 patients (age range, 19–87 years; mean age, 50 years) with clinically or sonographically detected complex adnexal masses. We used a 1.5-T unit to perform T1-, T2-, and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences before and after IV injection of gadolinium. The adnexal lesions were examined for several features including size, shape, character (solid–cystic), vegetation, signal intensity, and enhancement. Secondary signs such as ascites, peritoneal disease, and lymphadenopathy were noted. We compared the imaging features with the surgical and pathologic findings. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on all MR imaging features.

RESULTS. A total of 163 lesions—94 benign and 69 malignant lesions—were examined. On MR imaging, 95% (155/163) of the lesions were detected. The overall accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy was 91%. On univariate analysis, the imaging features associated with malignancy were a solid–cystic lesion, irregularity, and vegetation on the wall and septum in a cystic lesion, the large size of the lesion, an early enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images, and the presence of ascites, peritoneal disease, or adenopathy. On multiple logistic regression analysis, ascites and vegetation in a cystic lesion were the factors most significantly indicative of malignancy.

CONCLUSION. MR imaging is highly accurate in the characterization of adnexal mass lesions, and the best predictors of malignancy are vegetation in a cystic lesion and ascites.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Lalwani, A. K. P. Shanbhogue, R. Vikram, A. Nagar, J. Jagirdar, and S. R. Prasad
Current Update on Borderline Ovarian Neoplasms
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2010; 194(2): 330 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. L. Brown, K. M. Dudiak, and F. C. Laing
Adnexal Masses: US Characterization and Reporting
Radiology, February 1, 2010; 254(2): 342 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Thomassin-Naggara, M. Bazot, E. Darai, P. Callard, J. Thomassin, and C. A. Cuenod
Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Correlation with Tumor Angiogenesis
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 148 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Adusumilli, H. K. Hussain, E. M. Caoili, W. J. Weadock, J. P. Murray, T. D. Johnson, Q. Chen, and B. Desjardins
MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 732 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
M V Pakkal and M Balogun
Imaging of ovarian cancer
Imaging, August 1, 2006; 18(1): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A Spencer
A multidisciplinary approach to ovarian cancer at diagnosis
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S94 - S102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Saini, R. Dina, G. A. McIndoe, W. P. Soutter, P. Gishen, and N. M. deSouza
Characterization of Adnexal Masses with MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 1004 - 1009.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.