|
|
||||||||
Original Report |
1 All authors: Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the characteristic MR imaging findings and histopathologic correlation of peritumoral fat sparing of liver metastasis in patients with fatty liver.
CONCLUSION. Out-of-phase spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging was useful in detecting and characterizing the peritumoral fat sparing of liver metastasis in patients with fatty liver that was isointense to surrounding hepatic parenchyma on unenhanced in-phase spoiled gradient-echo, T2-weighted inversion recovery, and contrast-enhanced nonsuppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. W. Kim, M. J. Kim, S. S. Lee, H. J. Kim, Y. M. Shin, P.-N. Kim, and M.-G. Lee Sparing of Fatty Infiltration Around Focal Hepatic Lesions in Patients with Hepatic Steatosis: Sonographic Appearance with CT and MRI Correlation Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 1018 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-S. Yu, J.-G. Park, E.-K. Jeong, M.-S. Park, and K. W. Kim Hepatic MRI Using the Double-Echo Chemical Shift Phase-Selective Gradient-Echo Technique Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): W49 - W56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Merkle and R. C. Nelson Dual Gradient-Echo In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Hepatic MR Imaging: A Useful Tool for Evaluating More Than Fatty Infiltration or Fatty Sparing RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1409 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J A Robinson Fat and the liver Imaging, September 1, 2004; 16(4): 364 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Tom, B. M. Yeh, J. C. Cheng, A. Qayyum, B. Joe, and F. V. Coakley Hepatic Pseudotumor Due To Nodular Fatty Sparing: The Diagnostic Role of Opposed-Phase MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 721 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |