HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huber, A. Articles by Reiser, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huber, A. Articles by Reiser, M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Moving-Table MR Angiography of the Peripheral Runoff Vessels: Comparison of Body Coil and Dedicated Phased Array Coil Systems

¹ Department of Clinical Radiology, Klinikum der LMU, Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 München, Germany.
² Siemens AG, Medizintechnik, Henkestr. 127, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
³ Department of Surgery, Klinikum der LMU, Großhadern, 81377 München, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of our study was to compare the signal-to-noise ratio and the diagnostic accuracy of moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral arteries with body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty patients were examined with digital subtraction angiography and moving-table MR angiography with a 1.5-T MR imaging system either with a body coil (n = 20) or with a dedicated phased array coil (n = 20). The timing of contrast material was performed with real-time MR fluoroscopy.

RESULTS. For the iliac artery, upper leg, and lower leg, the mean values for signal-to-noise ratios were 56, 51, and 17, respectively, for the body coil, and 54, 74, and 64, respectively, for the dedicated phased array coil. For the body coil, sensitivity and specificity in identifying stenosis greater than 50% and occlusions were 100% and 96%, respectively, for the iliac arteries, and 100% and 96%, respectively, for the upper leg. For the dedicated phased array coil, sensitivity and specificity for stenosis greater than 50% and occlusions were 100% and 96%, respectively, for the iliac arteries, and 100% and 98%, respectively, for the upper leg. Sensitivity and specificity were inferior for the body coil (88% and 85%) compared with the dedicated phased array coil (100% and 96%) in the lower leg. A significant difference of the mean values of contrast-to-noise ratio was found before and after subtraction for the dedicated phased array coil and body-coil techniques (Student's t test, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION. In comparison with the body coil, the dedicated peripheral phased array surface coil system improves signal-to-noise ratio for the upper and lower leg and diagnostic accuracy in the lower leg.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Ersoy and F. J. Rybicki MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1675 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Paetzel, N Zorger, O W Hamer, J Seitz, T Schleicher, S Feuerbach, W R Nitz, M Lenhart, and T Herold Intra-arterial MR angiography in the iliac system: initial clinical experience with 25 patients. Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2006; 79(940): 298 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ouwendijk, M. de Vries, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, M. W. de Haan, T. Stijnen, J. M. A. van Engelshoven, and M. G. M. Hunink Imaging Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 1094 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]