HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Roberts, C. C. Articles by Colby, T. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roberts, C. C. Articles by Colby, T. V. Social Bookmarking                      What's this? Hotlight (NEW!) What's Hotlight?

Encapsulated Versus Nonencapsulated Superficial Fatty Masses: A Proposed MR Imaging Classification

¹ Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ 85259.
² Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ 85259.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the MR imaging appearance of palpable fatty masses and to propose terminology for palpable subcutaneous fatty masses that are nonencapsulated on MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. We searched the past 7 years of our institution's radiology database for reports of MR images containing the word "lipoma." Medical records were reviewed to identify patients with palpable masses corresponding to fat. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the MR images for the presence of an encapsulated or nonencapsulated fatty mass in the region of the palpable abnormality. Pathologic specimens, when available, were also reviewed.

RESULTS. Between 1995 and 2001, 184 palpable subcutaneous fatty masses were evaluated on MR imaging. Of these, 46% (85/184) were encapsulated lipomas and 54% (99/184) were nonencapsulated fatty masses on MR imaging. Four masses (three encapsulated and one nonencapsulated) were surgically resected and had pathology consistent with lipomas.

CONCLUSION. Many palpable fatty masses do not have definable capsules on MR imaging. We propose that a palpable mass that corresponds to a nonencapsulated prominence of subcutaneous fat on MR imaging should be reported as a nonencapsulated lipoma. More definitive reporting of this relatively common lesion will assure the referring clinician of the benign nature.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Roberts, W. B. Morrison, and P. T. Liu Imaging Evaluation of Foot and Ankle Pathology: Self-Assessment Module Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3_Supplement): S18 - S22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Murphey, J. F. Carroll, D. J. Flemming, T. L. Pope, F. H. Gannon, and M. J. Kransdorf From the Archives of the AFIP: Benign Musculoskeletal Lipomatous Lesions RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1433 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]