|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital,
Pauwelsstr. 30, Aachen D 52057, Germany.
2 Institute for Biometrics, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen D 52057,
Germany.
OBJECTIVE. We compared phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging with fundamental B-mode sonography in the evaluation of focal lesions of the kidney.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. For our prospective study, 114 patients underwent sonography of the kidneys in both modes, fundamental B-mode sonography and phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging, in a randomly chosen scanning order. Imaging parameters were standardized. Sonographic diagnoses were made under real-time conditions by the examining radiologist. All sonographic diagnoses were compared with a diagnostic reference modality: contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced MR imaging, or histopathology. Three radiologists different from the examiners evaluated overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and fluidsolid differentiation for both modalities using hard-copy images.
RESULTS. In 70 patients, fundamental B-mode sonography as the first technique depicted 73 of 111 lesions 10 mm or larger and enabled 71 lesions to be correctly characterized (sensitivity, 65.8%; accuracy, 64.0%). As the first mode, phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging depicted 57 of 65 focal lesions and enabled 54 lesions to be accurately classified in 44 patients (sensitivity, 87.7%; accuracy, 83.1%). The differences in sensitivity and accuracy were statistically significant (95% confidence interval). For overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and fluidsolid differentiation phase-inversion harmonic imaging was superior to fundamental B-mode sonography (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION. Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging is superior to fundamental B-mode sonography in the sonography of focal kidney lesions because phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging has better overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and fluidsolid differentiation. In six cases, phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging added crucial diagnostic information that changed patient management.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. I. Jonisch, A. N. Rubinowitz, P. G. Mutalik, and G. M. Israel Can High-Attenuation Renal Cysts Be Differentiated from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Unenhanced CT? Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 445 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R H Scott, L Walker, O E Olsen, G Levitt, I Kenney, E Maher, C M Owens, K Pritchard-Jones, A Craft, and N Rahman Surveillance for Wilms tumour in at-risk children: pragmatic recommendations for best practice Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 995 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Hartman, P. L. Choyke, and M. S. Hartman From the RSNA Refresher Courses: A Practical Approach to the Cystic Renal Mass RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S101 - S115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |