AJR Join ARRS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steingruber, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaschke, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steingruber, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaschke, W. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:99-108
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Pretransplantation Evaluation of the Cirrhotic Liver with Explantation Correlation: Accuracy of CT Arterioportography and Digital Subtraction Hepatic Angiography in Revealing Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Iris E. Steingruber1, Ammar Mallouhi1, Benedikt V. Czermak1, Peter Waldenberger1, Eva Gassner1, Felix Offner2, Andreas Chemelli1, Alfred Koenigsrainer3, Wolfgang Vogel4 and Werner R. Jaschke1

1 Department of Radiology, Kurt Amplatz Center, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
2 Institute of Pathology, Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria.
3 Department of Transplantation-Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Innsbruck University Hospital, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of CT arterioportography and hepatic digital subtraction angiography, separately and combined, for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver by using thin-section liver explant histopathologic findings.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-nine patients with liver cirrhosis were examined with CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography as a part of preoperative diagnostic workup for liver transplantation. Before liver explantation, CT arterioportograms and digital subtraction angiograms were prospectively evaluated in a blinded manner, separately by two CT radiologists and two angiographers, respectively, and combined by two reviewer teams, each including a CT radiologist and an angiographer. In addition, each examination was retrospectively evaluated using direct comparison with the corresponding thin-section liver explant specimens

RESULTS. There were 39 histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinomas. In both prospective and retrospective assessments, the reviewers achieved the best performance with CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combined (area under the curve [Az] 0.82). The diagnostic confidence in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma was higher with digital subtraction angiography (Az, 0.81) than that with CT arterioportography (Az, 0.68). Prospectively, sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 60% for CT arterioportography, 77% and 80% for digital subtraction angiography, and 84% and 81% for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combined, respectively. Retrospectively, sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 62% for CT arterioportography; 82% and 79% for digital subtraction angiography; 87% and 81% for CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combined, respectively. Five hepatocellular carcinomas, one poorly and four well differentiated, with a mean size of 1.4 cm were not detectable on the CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination. False-positive findings were 20, 11, and 10 on CT arterioportography, digital subtraction angiography, and the CT arterioportography and digital subtraction angiography combination.

CONCLUSION. Combining CT arterioportography with digital subtraction angiography enabled reliable detectability of moderately and poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic livers but was less sensitive for the detection of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas and resulted in a relatively high rate of false-positive findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Kanematsu, A. Mallouhi, E. M. Gassner, I. Steingruber, and W. R. Jaschke
How Should We Evaluate CT During Arterial Portography in Patients with Cirrhosis?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2004; 182(2): 529 - 530.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.