AJR F and L Medical Products: Radiation Protection & More
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Rubesin, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, J. O.
Right arrow Articles by Rubesin, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 181:415-420
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Usefulness of High-Density Barium for Detection of Leaks After Esophagogastrectomy, Total Gastrectomy, and Total Laryngectomy

Jonathan O. Swanson1, Marc S. Levine, Regina O. Redfern and Stephen E. Rubesin

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of a high-density (250% weight/volume) barium compared with a water-soluble contrast agent for the detection of esophageal leaks in patients who had undergone esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy, or total laryngectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS.A search of our radiology database from 1998 to 2001 revealed 46 eligible radiographic studies performed using a water-soluble contrast agent alone or a water-soluble contrast agent followed by barium that showed leaks in patients who had undergone esophagogastrectomy, total gastrectomy, or total laryngectomy. The images were reviewed to determine the morphology of the leaks (i.e., blind-ending tracks, sealed-off collections, or free extravasation of contrast material). Medical records were also reviewed to determine whether detection of the leaks seen on the radiographic studies affected patient management.

RESULTS. Of the 46 leaks seen on radiographic studies, 23 (50%) were detected with a water-soluble contrast agent and 23 (50%) were detected only with high-density barium. Of the 23 leaks visualized with water-soluble contrast media, six (26%) were characterized by blind-ending tracks, 14 (61%) by sealed-off collections, and three (13%) by free extravasation of contrast material into the mediastinum or neck. Of the 23 leaks visualized only with high-density barium, 19 (83%) were characterized by blind-ending tracks and four (17%) by sealed-off collections. Thus, leaks detected only on images obtained with high-density barium were significantly more likely to be characterized by blind-ending tracks than those detected on images obtained with a water-soluble contrast agent (p = 0.0007). Of the 33 patients with clinical follow-up, the findings seen on these imaging studies affected management in 12 (86%) of 14 patients with leaks depicted by water-soluble contrast media and in 10 (53%) of 19 with leaks depicted only by high-density barium.

CONCLUSION. Our findings support the use of high-density barium as part of the routine postoperative radiographic examination when no leaks are detected on images obtained with a water-soluble contrast agent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S UPPONI, A GANESHAN, H D'COSTA, M BETTS, N MAYNARD, H BUNGAY, and A SLATER
Radiological detection of post-oesophagectomy anastomotic leak -- a comparison between multidetector CT and fluoroscopy
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 545 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
V. Panebianco, F. Francioni, M. Anzidei, M. Anile, M. Rolla, and R. Passariello
Magnetic resonance-fluoroscopy as long-term follow-up examination in patients with narrow gastric tube reconstruction after radical esophagectomy.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 30(4): 663 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Ercan, T. W. Rice, S. C. Murthy, L. A. Rybicki, and E. H. Blackstone
Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2005; 129(3): 623 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Fadoo, D. E. Ruiz, S. K. Dawn, W. R. Webb, and M. B. Gotway
Helical CT Esophagography for the Evaluation of Suspected Esophageal Perforation or Rupture
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1177 - 1179.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.