AJR ARRS Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liberman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, L. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:519-525
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Ductal Enhancement on MR Imaging of the Breast

Laura Liberman1, Elizabeth A. Morris1, D. David Dershaw1, Andrea F. Abramson1 and Lee K. Tan2

1 Breast Imaging Section, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021.
2 Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and positive predictive value of ductal enhancement among MR imaging–detected breast lesions that had biopsy and to assess the histologic findings associated with ductal enhancement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed of 427 nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MR imaging–guided needle localization and surgical biopsy. Lesions were reviewed by one radiologist who was unaware of the histologic outcomes and were classified according to a standardized lexicon. MR imaging and histologic findings of ductal enhancing lesions were reviewed.

RESULTS. Ductal enhancement accounted for 88 (21%) of 427 lesions and 88 (59%) of 150 nonmass lesions. Histologic finding in these 88 lesions were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 18 (20%); infiltrating carcinoma in five (6%), including three with DCIS; lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) in nine (10%); atypical ductal hyperplasia in eight (9%); and benign in 48 (55%). Among the 48 benign lesions, the dominant histologic findings were fibrocystic change (n = 16); ductal hyperplasia (n = 8); fibrosis (n = 8); postbiopsy change (n = 5); benign breast tissue (n = 3); sclerosing adenosis (n = 2); and single cases of fibroadenoma, fibroadenomatoid change, lymph node, mastitis, papilloma, and radial scar. Factors associated with a trend toward a higher frequency of carcinoma included clumped enhancement (p = 0.05) and synchronous ipsilateral cancer (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION. Ductal enhancement accounted for 21% of MR imaging–detected lesions that had biopsy and had a positive predictive value of 26%. Differential diagnosis of ductal enhancement includes carcinoma (usually DCIS); atypical ductal hyperplasia; LCIS; and benign findings such as fibrocystic change, ductal hyperplasia, and fibrosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
M. E. Noz and G. Q. Maguire Jr.
Reply: 18F-FDG PET in Detecting Primary Breast Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1752 - 1752.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Kuhl
The Current Status of Breast MR Imaging * Part I. Choice of Technique, Image Interpretation, Diagnostic Accuracy, and Transfer to Clinical Practice
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 356 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki, T. Igarashi, and K. Fukuda
Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Shimauchi, T. Yamada, A. Sato, K. Takase, S. Usami, T. Ishida, T. Moriya, and S. Takahashi
Comparison of MDCT and MRI for evaluating the intraductal component of breast cancer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 322 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Tozaki and K. Fukuda
High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 330 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. Erguvan-Dogan, G. J. Whitman, A. C. Kushwaha, M. J. Phelps, and P. J. Dempsey
BI-RADS-MRI: a primer.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): W152 - W160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Schnall, J. Blume, D. A. Bluemke, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, E. D. Pisano, et al.
Diagnostic Architectural and Dynamic Features at Breast MR Imaging: Multicenter Study
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 42 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, H. H. Schild, and N. Morakkabati
Dynamic Bilateral Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast: Trade-off between Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Yeh, P. Slanetz, D. B. Kopans, E. Rafferty, D. Georgian-Smith, L. Moy, E. Halpern, R. Moore, I. Kuter, and A. Taghian
Prospective Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Palpable Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 868 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.