| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Technology, Aachen,
University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
2 Siemens Medical Solutions, Siemensstr., D-91301 Forchheim, Germany.
3 Medical Clinic I, University of Technology, Aachen, University Hospital,
D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of individual body weight–adapted tube current time settings in multidetector CT for detection of coronary calcifications and to evaluate the effect of reducing the radiation dose on the coronary calcium score.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred patients underwent retrospectively ECG-gated MDCT for detection of coronary calcifications. First, fixed tube current time settings were used in 50 patients. Second, image noise corresponding to body weight–adapted tube current time settings was added to these images. Finally, body weight–adapted tube current time settings were applied to another 50 patients. For each patient group, the radiation dose was calculated. Coronary calcium scores were compared for the patient groups with the fixed tube current time settings with and without artificially added image noise. In all image series, image noise was assessed by a region-of-interest methodology. Image noise was analyzed using a regression analysis.
RESULTS. The effective radiation dose was reduced by 11.6% for men and 24.8% for women using the body weight–adapted tube current time settings. There were no statistically significant changes in the coronary calcium score after the addition of artificial image noise (p = 0.84). Adaptation of the tube current time settings did not lead to a relevant increase in image noise. The radiation doses for the plotted noise-to-body weight (slope, 0.081) and noise-to-body mass index (slope, 0.378) ratios for the standard protocol proved relatively high for patients of lower weight. An improved noise-to-body weight (slope, 0.054) and noise-to-body mass index (slope, 0.190) ratio was achieved by application of the body weight–adapted tube current time settings, resulting in nearly constant image noise related to body weight.
CONCLUSION. Individual body weight–adapted current time settings are applicable for coronary calcium scoring without a change of the coronary calcium score or relevant increase of the image noise.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Husmann, B. A. Herzog, N. Burkhard, I. Valenta, I. A. Burger, O. Gaemperli, and P. A. Kaufmann Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography With Prospective ECG Triggering: Validation of a Contrast Material Protocol Adapted to Body Mass Index Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 802 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L HUSMANN, O GAEMPERLI, I VALENTA, T SCHEPIS, H SCHEFFEL, P STOLZMANN, S LESCHKA, L DESBIOLLES, B MARINCEK, H ALKADHI, et al. Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2009; 82(980): 649 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Tatsugami, L. Husmann, B. A. Herzog, N. Burkhard, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, and P. A. Kaufmann Evaluation of a Body Mass Index-Adapted Protocol for Low-Dose 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography with Prospective ECG Triggering Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 635 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Kim, M. J. Chung, K. S. Lee, Y. H. Choe, C. A. Yi, and B.-K. Choe Coronary Calcium Screening Using Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening: Effectiveness of MDCT with Retrospective Reconstruction Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 917 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-T. Wu, P. Yang, Y.-L. Huang, J.-S. Chen, C.-C. Chuo, C. Yeh, and R.-S. Chang Coronary Arterial Calcification on Low-Dose Ungated MDCT for Lung Cancer Screening: Concordance Study with Dedicated Cardiac CT Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 923 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Honnef, J. E. Wildberger, G. Haras, C. Hohl, G. Staatz, R. W. Gunther, and A. H. Mahnken Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality with Use of a Patient Image Gallery for Dose Reduction in Pediatric 16-MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 467 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al. Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, N. Hirai, Y. Akiyama, C. Fujioka, K. Marukawa, H. Fukuda, and K. Ito Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W1 - W6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, H. M. Krumholz, M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, and H. M. Krumholz Noninvasive Screening for Coronary Artery Disease With Computed Tomography Is Useful Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 125 - 146. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. W. Sandstede, J. Stoffels, F. Wendel, C. Ritter, M. Beer, and D. Hahn Different Reconstruction Intervals for Exclusion of Coronary Artery Calcifications by Retrospectively Gated MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 193 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Shemesh, R. Evron, N. Koren-Morag, S. Apter, J. Rozenman, D. Shaham, Y. Itzchak, and M. Motro Coronary Artery Calcium Measurement with Multi-Detector Row CT and Low Radiation Dose: Comparison between 55 and 165 mAs Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 810 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Irie and H. Inoue Individual Modulation of the Tube Current-Seconds to Achieve Similar Levels of Image Noise in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1514 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
