AJR Women's Imaging Online
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knopp, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Spinazzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knopp, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Spinazzi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:663-676
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Analysis of Dose Response and Comparison with Gadopentetate Dimeglumine

Michael V. Knopp1,2, Michael W. Bourne3, Francesco Sardanelli4, Martin N. Wasser5, Lorenzo Bonomo6, Carla Boetes7, Markus Müller-Schimpfle8, Margaret A. Hall-Craggs9, Bernd Hamm10, Antonio Orlacchio11, Carlo Bartolozzi12, Mareike Kessler13, Uwe Fischer14, Günther Schneider15, Matthijs Oudkerk16, William L. Teh17, Hans-Björn Gehl18, Isabella Salerio19, Gianpaolo Pirovano19, Anna La Noce19, Miles A. Kirchin19 and Alberto Spinazzi19

1 Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Health Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, United Kingdom.
4 Biomedical SpA., Servizio di Radiologia, Via Prà 1/b, 16157 Genova, Italy.
5 Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands.
6 Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche e Formazione dell'Immagine, Ospedale SS. Annunziata, Via P. Valignani 66100, Chieti, Italy.
7 Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen-St. Radboud, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
8 Eberhardt Karls-Universität, Radiologische Universitätsklinik, Abteilung für Radiologische Diagnostik, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
9 MRI Department, Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer St., London W1 N8AA, United Kingdom.
10 Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität, Institut für Röntgendiagnostik Charité, Schumannstr. 20/21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany.
11 Radiologia e Diagnostica per Immagini, Ospedale Generale S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebene Fratelli, Isola Tiberina 39, 00186 Rome, Italy.
12 Instituto di Radiologia, Ente Ospedaliero di Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56125 Pisa, Italy.
13 Institut für Radiologische Diagnostik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Grosshadern, 81377 Munich, Germany.
14 Röntgendiagnostik I, Georg-August-Universität, Robert Koch Str. 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany.
15 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
16 State University Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, P. O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
17 Department of Radiology, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Rd., Harrow HA1 3UG, United Kingdom.
18 Institut für Radiologie Medizinischen, Universität Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
19 Worldwide Medical Affairs, Bracco Imaging SpA., Via E. Folli 50, 20134 Milano, Italy.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and dose response relationship of three doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for MRI of the breast and to compare the results with those obtained after a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg of body weight or gadopentetate dimeglumine at 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight was administered by IV bolus injection to 189 patients with known or suspected breast cancer. Coronal three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 min after the administration of the dose. Images were evaluated for lesion presence, location, size, morphology, enhancement pattern, conspicuity, and type. Lesion signal intensity-time curves were acquired, and lesion matching with on-site final diagnosis was performed. A determination of global lesion detection from unenhanced to contrast-enhanced and combined images was performed, and evaluations were made of the diagnostic accuracy for lesion detection and characterization. A full safety evaluation was conducted.

RESULTS. Significant dose-related increases in global lesion detection were noted for patients who recieved gadobenate dimeglumine (p < 0.04, all evaluations). The sensitivity for detection was comparable for 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine, and specificity was highest with the 0.1 mmol/kg dose. Higher detection scores and higher sensitivity values for lesion characterization were found for 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine compared with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine, although more variable specificity values were obtained. No differences in safety were observed, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION. Gadobenate dimeglumine is a capable diagnostic agent for MRI of the breast. Although preliminary, our results suggest that 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine may offer advantages over doses of 0.05 and 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast lesion detection and characterization.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Makkat, R. Luypaert, T. Stadnik, C. Bourgain, S. Sourbron, M. Dujardin, J. De Greve, and J. De Mey
Deconvolution-based Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of Breast Tumors: Correlation of Tumor Blood Flow with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status and Clinicopathologic Findings--Preliminary Results
Radiology, September 9, 2008; (2008) 2492071147.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. F. Hanna, D. A. Aguirre, N. Kased, S. C. Emery, M. R. Peterson, and C. B. Sirlin
Cirrhosis-associated Hepatocellular Nodules: Correlation of Histopathologic and MR Imaging Features
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 747 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Sardanelli
Vascular Maps on Contrast-enhanced Breast MR Images: A New Approach Requiring Further Investigation
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 295 - 296.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, A. Roselli, S. Padula, F. Altomari, E. Moriconi, A. M. Pronio, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography for Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Diagnosed Unilateral Breast Cancer or High-Risk Lesions
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 670 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, R. Occhiato, F. Venditti, F. Fraioli, A. Napoli, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization at Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography: Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Sardanelli, A. Iozzelli, A. Fausto, A. Carriero, and M. A. Kirchin
Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Imaging Breast Vascular Maps: Association between Invasive Cancer and Ipsilateral Increased Vascularity
Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. M. Hylton
Evaluation of Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 677 - 678.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.