|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital
Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45122, Germany.
2 Department of Angiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen 45122,
Germany.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI and MR angiography for the assessment of peripheral vascular malformations compared with the usefulness of conventional duplex sonography, venography, and arteriography.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients (age range, 8-64 years; 11 males and eight females) with clinically diagnosed or suspected angiodyplastic abnormalities of the extremities were examined on a 1.5-T whole-body MR scanner. Using parameters based on a fast localizer sequence, we acquired transverse or coronal T1-, T2-, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo MRIs were acquired to determine the extent and type of the arteriovenous malformation for each patient. MR data sets were evaluated for lesion depiction, determination of the extent of the malformation, involvement of neighboring structures, vascular detail, and treatment planning. Results were compared with findings from duplex sonography, venography, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
RESULTS. All MRIs were of diagnostic quality and revealed 12 venous vascular malformations, four arteriovenous malformations, and three hemangiomas. The STIR sequence was helpful for determining the extent of the vascular malformation, which was often underestimated using contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography alone, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography was required for classifying the type of the lesion. MR angiography was inferior to conventional angiography for revealing vascular detail and for planning intervention.
CONCLUSION. MRI and MR angiography appear to be valuable for the assessment of vascular malformations of the extremities. The protocol for imaging such malformations should combine dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI with STIR sequences. However, digital subtraction angiography and venography are still required for definitive treatment decisions.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Muller, D. Mayer, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann Recurrent Lower-Limb Varicose Veins: Effect of Direct Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venographic Findings on Diagnostic Thinking and Therapeutic Decisions Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 887 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Stepansky, E. M. Hecht, R. Rivera, L. E. Hirsh, B. Taouli, M. Kaur, and V. S. Lee Dynamic MR Angiography of Upper Extremity Vascular Disease: Pictorial Review RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): e28 - e28. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. K. Yu, C. C. Lin, P. K. Chan, E. S. H. Chow, M. B. Murphy, B. P. Chan, F. Muller, U. Strahle, and S. H. Cheng Four-Dimensional Imaging and Quantification of Gene Expression in Early Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 529 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ohgiya, T. Hashimoto, T. Gokan, S. Watanabe, M. Kuroda, M. Hirose, S. Matsui, H. Nobusawa, T. Kitanosono, and H. Munechika Dynamic MRI for Distinguishing High-Flow from Low-Flow Peripheral Vascular Malformations Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1131 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Kellenberger, M. Epelman, S. F. Miller, and P. S. Babyn Fast STIR Whole-Body MR Imaging in Children RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1317 - 1330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |