AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herborn, C. U.
Right arrow Articles by Kröger, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herborn, C. U.
Right arrow Articles by Kröger, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 181:729-735
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Comprehensive Time-Resolved MRI of Peripheral Vascular Malformations

Christoph U. Herborn1, Mathias Goyen1, Thomas C. Lauenstein1, Jörg F. Debatin1, Stefan G. Ruehm1 and Knut Kröger2

1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45122, Germany.
2 Department of Angiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen 45122, Germany.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI and MR angiography for the assessment of peripheral vascular malformations compared with the usefulness of conventional duplex sonography, venography, and arteriography.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients (age range, 8-64 years; 11 males and eight females) with clinically diagnosed or suspected angiodyplastic abnormalities of the extremities were examined on a 1.5-T whole-body MR scanner. Using parameters based on a fast localizer sequence, we acquired transverse or coronal T1-, T2-, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo MRIs were acquired to determine the extent and type of the arteriovenous malformation for each patient. MR data sets were evaluated for lesion depiction, determination of the extent of the malformation, involvement of neighboring structures, vascular detail, and treatment planning. Results were compared with findings from duplex sonography, venography, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

RESULTS. All MRIs were of diagnostic quality and revealed 12 venous vascular malformations, four arteriovenous malformations, and three hemangiomas. The STIR sequence was helpful for determining the extent of the vascular malformation, which was often underestimated using contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography alone, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography was required for classifying the type of the lesion. MR angiography was inferior to conventional angiography for revealing vascular detail and for planning intervention.

CONCLUSION. MRI and MR angiography appear to be valuable for the assessment of vascular malformations of the extremities. The protocol for imaging such malformations should combine dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI with STIR sequences. However, digital subtraction angiography and venography are still required for definitive treatment decisions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Muller, D. Mayer, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Recurrent Lower-Limb Varicose Veins: Effect of Direct Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venographic Findings on Diagnostic Thinking and Therapeutic Decisions
Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 887 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. Stepansky, E. M. Hecht, R. Rivera, L. E. Hirsh, B. Taouli, M. Kaur, and V. S. Lee
Dynamic MR Angiography of Upper Extremity Vascular Disease: Pictorial Review
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): e28 - e28.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. M. K. Yu, C. C. Lin, P. K. Chan, E. S. H. Chow, M. B. Murphy, B. P. Chan, F. Muller, U. Strahle, and S. H. Cheng
Four-Dimensional Imaging and Quantification of Gene Expression in Early Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 529 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Ohgiya, T. Hashimoto, T. Gokan, S. Watanabe, M. Kuroda, M. Hirose, S. Matsui, H. Nobusawa, T. Kitanosono, and H. Munechika
Dynamic MRI for Distinguishing High-Flow from Low-Flow Peripheral Vascular Malformations
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1131 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Kellenberger, M. Epelman, S. F. Miller, and P. S. Babyn
Fast STIR Whole-Body MR Imaging in Children
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1317 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.