| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Intestinal Imaging, Intestinal Imaging Centre, Level 4V, St.
Mark's Hospital, Watford Rd., Northwick Park, London HA1 3UJ, United
Kingdom.
2 Cancer Research UK Colorectal Cancer Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Northwick
Park, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
3 Wolfson Institute of Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Northwick Park, London
HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of multidetector CT colonography, total colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema to ascertain any overall preference.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent CT colonography followed by either flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 59) or colonoscopy (n = 109). A 25-point questionnaire with principal components relating to satisfaction, worry, and physical discomfort was administered after CT colonography and after endoscopy, and a follow-up questionnaire was administered 1 week after the procedures. Questionnaires were also completed by 140 patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon's matched pairs test and the Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS. Overall satisfaction was greater with colonoscopy (p = 0.01), but CT colonography caused less discomfort (p = 0.002), was better tolerated (p = 0.005), and was the preferred follow-up investigation of those expressing a preference (p = 0.003). Compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography caused less pain (p = 0.004), was more acceptable (p = 0.04), and was preferred as the follow-up investigation (p < 0.001). Tolerance of colonoscopy was significantly less in women (p = 0.03), but such was not the case for CT colonography (p = 0.58). Patients undergoing CT colonography were less worried (p < 0.001), were more satisfied (p = 0.001), and suffered less discomfort (p < 0.001) than those having barium enema.
CONCLUSION. Patients' experiences with barium enema examinations were significantly worse than with any other test. Although patients were most satisfied with colonoscopy, they reported more pain during both colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy than during CT colonography, and they also found CT more acceptable. In patients expressing a preference, CT colonography was the preferred follow-up investigation.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. E. Duncan, M. P. McNally, W. B. Sweeney, A. B. Gentry, D. S. Barlow, D. W. Jensen, and B. D. Cash CT Colonography Predictably Overestimates Colonic Length and Distance to Polyps Compared With Optical Colonoscopy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2009; 193(5): 1291 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M H Liedenbaum, A F van Rijn, A H de Vries, H M Dekker, M Thomeer, C J van Marrewijk, L Hol, M G W Dijkgraaf, P Fockens, P M M Bossuyt, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening Gut, September 1, 2009; 58(9): 1242 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Regge, C. Laudi, G. Galatola, P. Della Monica, L. Bonelli, G. Angelelli, R. Asnaghi, B. Barbaro, C. Bartolozzi, D. Bielen, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer JAMA, June 17, 2009; 301(23): 2453 - 2461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C VON WAGNER, K KNIGHT, S HALLIGAN, W ATKIN, R LILFORD, D MORTON, and J WARDLE Patient experiences of colonoscopy, barium enema and CT colonography: a qualitative study Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Burling, J. E East, and S. A Taylor Investigating rectal bleeding BMJ, December 15, 2007; 335(7632): 1260 - 1262. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V A Sahni and D Burling The new NHS colorectal cancer screening programme and the potential role of radiology? Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 778 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Johnson, J. G. Fletcher, R. L. MacCarty, J. N. Mandrekar, W. S. Harmsen, P. J. Limburg, and L. A. Wilson Effect of Slice Thickness and Primary 2D Versus 3D Virtual Dissection on Colorectal Lesion Detection at CT Colonography in 452 Asymptomatic Adults Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 672 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Saar, A Meining, A Beer, M Settles, H Helmberger, E Frimberger, E J Rummeny, and T Rosch Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 235 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. WERDERMAN CT Colonography Radiol. Technol., March 1, 2007; 78(4): 309CT - 324CT. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A SLATER Alteration in bowel habit Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 208 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Xiong, K McEvoy, D G Morton, S Halligan, and R J Lilford Resources and costs associated with incidental extracolonic findings from CT colonogaphy: a study in a symptomatic population Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 948 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Burling, S. Halligan, A. Slater, M. J. Noakes, and S. A. Taylor Potentially Serious Adverse Events at CT Colonography in Symptomatic Patients: National Survey of the United Kingdom Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 464 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S A Taylor, S Halligan, A Slater, D Burling, M Marshall, and C I Bartram Comparison of Radiologists' confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema. Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 208 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Burling, S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, L. Gartner, M. Paliwalla, C. Peiris, L. Singh, P. Bassett, and C. Bartram Automated Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide for MDCT Colonography: Distension and Patient Experience Compared with Manual Insufflation Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 96 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. P. Mulhall, G. R. Veerappan, and J. L. Jackson Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 635 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ajaj, T. C. Lauenstein, G. Pelster, G. Holtmann, S. G. Ruehm, J. F. Debatin, and S. C. Goehde MR Colonography in Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 452 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cohnen, C. Vogt, A. Beck, K. Andersen, W. Heinen, S. vom Dahl, V. Aurich, D. Haeussinger, and U. Moedder Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in Ultra-Low-Dose Technique in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Comparison with High-Resolution Video Colonoscopy Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1355 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Bruzzi, H. M. Fenlon, S. Halligan, S. Taylor, P. Bassett, and C. Bartram Colonic Distention in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography [letter] * Dr Halligan and colleagues respond: Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 282 - 283. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
