AJR Your Link to CME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bartram, C. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
AJR 2003; 181:913-921
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Acceptance by Patients of Multidetector CT Colonography Compared with Barium Enema Examinations, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, and Colonoscopy

Stuart A. Taylor1, Steve Halligan1,2, Brian P. Saunders3, Paul Bassett1, Maggie Vance3 and Clive I. Bartram1

1 Department of Intestinal Imaging, Intestinal Imaging Centre, Level 4V, St. Mark's Hospital, Watford Rd., Northwick Park, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
2 Cancer Research UK Colorectal Cancer Unit, St. Mark's Hospital, Northwick Park, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.
3 Wolfson Institute of Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Northwick Park, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of multidetector CT colonography, total colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema to ascertain any overall preference.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent CT colonography followed by either flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 59) or colonoscopy (n = 109). A 25-point questionnaire with principal components relating to satisfaction, worry, and physical discomfort was administered after CT colonography and after endoscopy, and a follow-up questionnaire was administered 1 week after the procedures. Questionnaires were also completed by 140 patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon's matched pairs test and the Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS. Overall satisfaction was greater with colonoscopy (p = 0.01), but CT colonography caused less discomfort (p = 0.002), was better tolerated (p = 0.005), and was the preferred follow-up investigation of those expressing a preference (p = 0.003). Compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography caused less pain (p = 0.004), was more acceptable (p = 0.04), and was preferred as the follow-up investigation (p < 0.001). Tolerance of colonoscopy was significantly less in women (p = 0.03), but such was not the case for CT colonography (p = 0.58). Patients undergoing CT colonography were less worried (p < 0.001), were more satisfied (p = 0.001), and suffered less discomfort (p < 0.001) than those having barium enema.

CONCLUSION. Patients' experiences with barium enema examinations were significantly worse than with any other test. Although patients were most satisfied with colonoscopy, they reported more pain during both colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy than during CT colonography, and they also found CT more acceptable. In patients expressing a preference, CT colonography was the preferred follow-up investigation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Burling, J. E East, and S. A Taylor
Investigating rectal bleeding
BMJ, December 15, 2007; 335(7632): 1260 - 1262.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V A Sahni and D Burling
The new NHS colorectal cancer screening programme and the potential role of radiology?
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2007; 80(958): 778 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. D. Johnson, J. G. Fletcher, R. L. MacCarty, J. N. Mandrekar, W. S. Harmsen, P. J. Limburg, and L. A. Wilson
Effect of Slice Thickness and Primary 2D Versus 3D Virtual Dissection on Colorectal Lesion Detection at CT Colonography in 452 Asymptomatic Adults
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 672 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
B Saar, A Meining, A Beer, M Settles, H Helmberger, E Frimberger, E J Rummeny, and T Rosch
Prospective study on bright lumen magnetic resonance colonography in comparison with conventional colonoscopy
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
D. S. WERDERMAN
CT Colonography
Radiol. Technol., March 1, 2007; 78(4): 309CT - 324CT.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A SLATER
Alteration in bowel habit
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
T Xiong, K McEvoy, D G Morton, S Halligan, and R J Lilford
Resources and costs associated with incidental extracolonic findings from CT colonogaphy: a study in a symptomatic population
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2006; 79(948): 948 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Burling, S. Halligan, A. Slater, M. J. Noakes, and S. A. Taylor
Potentially Serious Adverse Events at CT Colonography in Symptomatic Patients: National Survey of the United Kingdom
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 464 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S A Taylor, S Halligan, A Slater, D Burling, M Marshall, and C I Bartram
Comparison of Radiologists' confidence in excluding significant colorectal neoplasia with multidetector-row CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema.
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2006; 79(939): 208 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Burling, S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, L. Gartner, M. Paliwalla, C. Peiris, L. Singh, P. Bassett, and C. Bartram
Automated Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide for MDCT Colonography: Distension and Patient Experience Compared with Manual Insufflation
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 96 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
B. P. Mulhall, G. R. Veerappan, and J. L. Jackson
Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography
Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 635 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Ajaj, T. C. Lauenstein, G. Pelster, G. Holtmann, S. G. Ruehm, J. F. Debatin, and S. C. Goehde
MR Colonography in Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Cohnen, C. Vogt, A. Beck, K. Andersen, W. Heinen, S. vom Dahl, V. Aurich, D. Haeussinger, and U. Moedder
Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in Ultra-Low-Dose Technique in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions: Comparison with High-Resolution Video Colonoscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1355 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. Bruzzi, H. M. Fenlon, S. Halligan, S. Taylor, P. Bassett, and C. Bartram
Colonic Distention in Multi-Detector Row CT Colonography [letter] * Dr Halligan and colleagues respond:
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 282 - 283.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.