| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Ghent University,
Proeftuinstraat 86, Gent B-9000, Belgium.
2 Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, Gent
B-9000, Belgium.
OBJECTIVE. We sought to compare the radiation dose delivered to patients undergoing clinical chest imaging on a full-field digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography system with the doses delivered by a state-of-the-art conventional film-screen radiography system and a storage phosphor-based computed radiography system. Image quality was evaluated to ensure that the potential reduction in radiation dose did not result in decreased image acuity.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Three groups of 100 patients each were examined using the amorphous silicon flat-panel detector, film-screen, or computed radiography systems. All patient groups were matched for body mass index, sex, and age. To measure the entrance skin dose, we attached 24 calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters to every patient. The calculation of the effective dose, which represents the risk of late radiation-induced effects, was based on measurements on an anthropomorphic phantom. Image quality of all three systems was evaluated by five experienced radiologists, using the European Quality Criteria for Chest Radiology. In addition, a contrast-detail phantom study was set up to assess the low-contrast detection of all three systems.
RESULTS. The amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography system allowed an important and significant reduction in both entrance skin dose and effective dose compared with the film-screen radiography (x 2.7 decrease) or computed radiography (x 1.7 decrease) system. In addition, image quality produced by the amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography system was significantly better than the image quality produced by the film-screen or computed radiography systems, confirming that the dose reduction was not detrimental to image quality.
CONCLUSION. The introduction of digital flat-panel radiography systems based on amorphous silicon and cesium iodide is an important step forward in chest imaging that offers improved image quality combined with a significant reduction in the patient radiation dose.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L J M Kroft, W J H Veldkamp, B J A Mertens, J-P A van Delft, and J Geleijns Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 984 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C S Moore, G P Liney, A W Beavis, and J R Saunderson A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 724 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Korner, C. H. Weber, S. Wirth, K.-J. Pfeifer, M. F. Reiser, and M. Treitl Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 675 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, J. P. A. van Delft, and J. Geleijns Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 392 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Bacher, P. Smeets, L. Vereecken, A. De Hauwere, P. Duyck, R. De Man, K. Verstraete, and H. Thierens Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 630 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. De Hauwere, K. Bacher, P. Smeets, K. Verstraete, and H. Thierens Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 174 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Neofotistou, V. Tsapaki, S. Kottou, A. Schreiner-Karoussou, and E. Vano Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 204 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. W. Hamer, C. B. Sirlin, M. Strotzer, I. Borisch, N. Zorger, S. Feuerbach, and M. Volk Chest Radiography with a Flat-Panel Detector: Image Quality with Dose Reduction after Copper Filtration Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 691 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. BRINDHABAN and K. AL KHALIFAH Radiation Dose in Pelvic Imaging Radiol. Technol., September 1, 2005; 77(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. M. Kroft, W. J. H. Veldkamp, B. J. A. Mertens, M. V. Boot, and J. Geleijns Comparison of Eight Different Digital Chest Radiography Systems: Variation in Detection of Simulated Chest Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 339 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I D Honey, A Mackenzie, and D S Evans Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 78(929): 422 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
