AJR AJR-based Continuing Ed for Technologists
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Hotlight (NEW!)
Right arrow
What's Hotlight?
AJR 2003; 181:1295-1299
© American Roentgen Ray Society


Accuracy of a Collagen-Plug Biopsy Site Marking Device Deployed After Stereotactic Core Needle Breast Biopsy

Eric L. Rosen1, Jay A. Baker and Mary Scott Soo

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Division, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

OBJECTIVE. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of clip placement of a collagen-plug biopsy marking device with that of the more conventional, previously evaluated metallic tissue-marking clips.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The placement accuracy of 31 collagen-plug marking devices was compared with the placement accuracy of 43 metallic marker clips deployed at biopsies performed between August 1, 2002, and November 20, 2002. The precision of marker placement was assessed by determining the position of the clip relative to the targeted mammographic lesion. Statistical analysis comparing the distance from the clip to the targeted lesion was performed.

RESULTS. Using a two-group Wilcoxon's rank sum test, we found the clip-to-target distances for the collagen-plug central titanium marker were significantly different from the clip-to-target distances of the conventional metallic marker clips (p = 0.04). There were significantly fewer cases in which the clip-to-target distance was 1 cm or greater on at least one mammographic projection with the collagen-plug marker (5/31) than with the conventional metallic marker clip (19/43) (chi-square test, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION. The collagen-plug marking device is an effective alternative to existing marker clips, and use of this device may result in fewer cases in which the marker clip is substantially displaced (>= 1 cm) away from the actual biopsy site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Calhoun, A. Giuliano, and R. J. Brenner
Intraoperative Loss of Core Biopsy Clips: Clinical Implications
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): W196 - W200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
J. E. Dotto, C. H. Lee, and F. Tavassoli
Macroscopic and Microscopic Images of the Collagen-Titanium Biopsy Site Marker Clip
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, January 1, 2006; 14(1): 35 - 36.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Roentgen Ray Society.